A thread about protesters

No, I would have probably been amongst the protesters.
The army would not now be bayoneting and shooting peaceful protesters, decisions made
in 1819 by magistrates are not applicable now, just like laws hanging children for stealing bread.

You are applying current standards and morals to those of a previous century. Apparently, we are not allowed to do this. The Ancient Citizen of the day would have cheered on the army, and supported the law of the day with regard to children stealing bread.

People that champion authoritarianism are rarely found in the streets fighting or protesting the state.
 
You are applying current standards and morals to those of a previous century. Apparently, we are not allowed to do this. The Ancient Citizen of the day would have cheered on the army, and supported the law of the day with regard to children stealing bread.

People that champion authoritarianism are rarely found in the streets fighting or protesting the state.
I wasn't the one who brought up the previous century, and the one in question is
actually the one before that, I just said that I'd be amongst the protesters, as they were
peaceful but you've ignored it, never mind.
You support lawbreakers, everyone must be free to do whatever they like, somehow
I don't think many will agree.
 
I wasn't the one who brought up the previous century, and the one in question is
actually the one before that, I just said that I'd be amongst the protesters, as they were
peaceful but you've ignored it, never mind.
You support lawbreakers, everyone must be free to do whatever they like, somehow
I don't think many will agree.

I said of ‘a previous century‘, not ‘the previous century’, and you would not be among the ‘lawbreakers’ of any century because you do not support lawbreakers. Your own words and attitudes tell us exactly where you would stand and that is not among the lawbreakers protesting in the street.
 
No, I would have probably been amongst the protesters.
The army would not now be bayoneting and shooting peaceful protesters, decisions made
in 1819 by magistrates are not applicable now, just like laws hanging children for stealing bread.
If a law was brought in next year that meant every person who had a cock in the country over the age of 21 had their cocks chopped off I assume you would be quite happy to say "its the law, goodbye Pornhub" and present yourself to the axeman forthwith for removal of your cock.
 
I said of ‘a previous century‘, not ‘the previous century’, and you would not be among the ‘lawbreakers’ of any century because you do not support lawbreakers. Your own words and attitudes tell us exactly where you would stand and that is not among the lawbreakers protesting in the street.
And your acceptance of lawbreakers you happen to like tells the rest of us that people like you are simply a noisy group of nutters. The courts agree.
 
If a law was brought in next year that meant every person who had a cock in the country over the age of 21 had their cocks chopped off I assume you would be quite happy to say "its the law, goodbye Pornhub" and present yourself to the axeman forthwith for removal of your cock.
Where you get everything wrong, is when your assumption mode goes into overdrive. If you don’t like certain laws, get campaigning against them, but lay off the superglue, otherwise Christmas in a cell is the result.
 
Relevance?

People bang on about almost mythical emergency vehicles being blocked from accessing A&E by protestors - examples are very very few however following the lead of the Daily Heil and Daily Fail and clutching pearls at these stories means people are distracted from the real story of a failing underfunded NHS
 
People bang on about almost mythical emergency vehicles being blocked from accessing A&E by protestors - examples are very very few however following the lead of the Daily Heil and Daily Fail and clutching pearls at these stories means people are distracted from the real story of a failing underfunded NHS
Right so just a load of whataboutism then?
 
Not at all - just pointing out what people should be protesting about however there are those who will have nothing said against this verminous scummy Govt

We can include the SNP and Welsh Labour then as also scummy and venomous given the ambulance services they run are also troubled by severe delays?

I know you won’t but surely you will agree, any delay, be it staffing, funding or some fucking idiot glued to the road is not good yeah?
 
We can include the SNP and Welsh Labour then as also scummy and venomous given the ambulance services they run are also troubled by severe delays?

I know you won’t but surely you will agree, any delay, be it staffing, funding or some fucking idiot glued to the road is not good yeah?

Yes - there is no excuse for - at this time - presiding over a shitshow
 
If a law was brought in next year that meant every person who had a cock in the country over the age of 21 had their cocks chopped off I assume you would be quite happy to say "its the law, goodbye Pornhub" and present yourself to the axeman forthwith for removal of your cock.
He has no balls so may as well be cock free as well:-)
 
If a law was brought in next year that meant every person who had a cock in the country over the age of 21 had their cocks chopped off I assume you would be quite happy to say "its the law, goodbye Pornhub" and present yourself to the axeman forthwith for removal of your cock.
Yes like that’s going to happen.
For fucks sake, it’s not difficult, protest peacefully and by not pissing off the general public and it’s be fine. The irony of all of these climate change protests is that in holding up the traffic with their actions they are actually causing more damage by prolonging everyone’s journeys!!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top