Tugay One Cup
Well-Known Member
I'm pretty sure he's thick as fuck and stumbled his way to success.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Adarabioyo joins Fulham on permanent deal
- Thread starter twosips
- Start date
I'm pretty sure he's thick as fuck and stumbled his way to success.
FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
Tosin hasn't been handled very well,but unfortunately that is far from unique where our HG academy kids are concerned.It comes to something when a vastly overrated,imported want away is selected before you.
The kid deserves far better,his loan at Blackburn proved he is a capable player.We could do much worse than keep him as our 4th/5th option and send THB on loan.
Personally,though,in his size 14's.....i'd be praying for an escape.
The kid deserves far better,his loan at Blackburn proved he is a capable player.We could do much worse than keep him as our 4th/5th option and send THB on loan.
Personally,though,in his size 14's.....i'd be praying for an escape.
Yeah not much planning goes into our youngsters between age 18-22. That is a crucial age for players, there are various development for each players, not one thing fits all.
We have about a dozen out on loan, CFG clubs and others, but even of they do impress on loan there is rarely a way back to City first team.
Unless it is the Angelino way, which means we sell him , buy him, loan him, then loan him again to sell him later on with option to buy...
Harrison too, did very well for Leeds, we agreed to loan him again with a piss poor optional fee if he does well in PL he is easily a 25-30m worth of player and Leeds can get him for like 10m?
If he will be very shit which is unlikely at this point they just wont buy him.
We send 10 guy out on loan and even if they do very well and ready to make thee next step we do sideway loans for them again instead of stepping up with us at City or selling them for a stronger club than his loan club was with option to buy back.
Angelino ending up in a loan with lesser option fee than what he had, he just gave another assist this weekend, if he does very well for them they can buy him for even less next summer than the option they had this summer.
At least he is at a strong club playing regularly, but this is when Leipzig may buy him out for that 18m euros and same summer they could get buyers for him for 30-40m euros instead of us profiting...
We have about a dozen out on loan, CFG clubs and others, but even of they do impress on loan there is rarely a way back to City first team.
Unless it is the Angelino way, which means we sell him , buy him, loan him, then loan him again to sell him later on with option to buy...
Harrison too, did very well for Leeds, we agreed to loan him again with a piss poor optional fee if he does well in PL he is easily a 25-30m worth of player and Leeds can get him for like 10m?
If he will be very shit which is unlikely at this point they just wont buy him.
We send 10 guy out on loan and even if they do very well and ready to make thee next step we do sideway loans for them again instead of stepping up with us at City or selling them for a stronger club than his loan club was with option to buy back.
Angelino ending up in a loan with lesser option fee than what he had, he just gave another assist this weekend, if he does very well for them they can buy him for even less next summer than the option they had this summer.
At least he is at a strong club playing regularly, but this is when Leipzig may buy him out for that 18m euros and same summer they could get buyers for him for 30-40m euros instead of us profiting...
southamptonblue
Well-Known Member
Yeah not much planning goes into our youngsters between age 18-22. That is a crucial age for players, there are various development for each players, not one thing fits all.
We have about a dozen out on loan, CFG clubs and others, but even of they do impress on loan there is rarely a way back to City first team.
Unless it is the Angelino way, which means we sell him , buy him, loan him, then loan him again to sell him later on with option to buy...
Harrison too, did very well for Leeds, we agreed to loan him again with a piss poor optional fee if he does well in PL he is easily a 25-30m worth of player and Leeds can get him for like 10m?
If he will be very shit which is unlikely at this point they just wont buy him.
We send 10 guy out on loan and even if they do very well and ready to make thee next step we do sideway loans for them again instead of stepping up with us at City or selling them for a stronger club than his loan club was with option to buy back.
Angelino ending up in a loan with lesser option fee than what he had, he just gave another assist this weekend, if he does very well for them they can buy him for even less next summer than the option they had this summer.
At least he is at a strong club playing regularly, but this is when Leipzig may buy him out for that 18m euros and same summer they could get buyers for him for 30-40m euros instead of us profiting...
Complete nonsense......the only loan who has even debatedly impressed is Angelino, who has had a chance here and wasn't up to it in what most would agree is the weakest position by some distance. The fact nobody really wants him is nothing to do with City....if any club rated him high enough they would pay the alleged £26m.
Harrison easily a £25-30m player...REALLY?? If anyone including Leeds thought that they would have offered it, Leeds had no competition to sign him did they?
Complete nonsense......the only loan who has even debatedly impressed is Angelino, who has had a chance here and wasn't up to it in what most would agree is the weakest position by some distance. The fact nobody really wants him is nothing to do with City....if any club rated him high enough they would pay the alleged £26m.
Harrison easily a £25-30m player...REALLY?? If anyone including Leeds thought that they would have offered it, Leeds had no competition to sign him did they?
Why would Leeds offer £25 million for Harrison when they can take him on loan for another year with an option to buy for £10 million?
The point is if he has another good season he’ll be worth far more than £10 million. Liverpool want £20 million plus for Harry Wilson and I think Harrison is an even better player than him.
Akpowell
Well-Known Member
How much was BrewsterWhy would Leeds offer £25 million for Harrison when they can take him on loan for another year with an option to buy for £10 million?
The point is if he has another good season he’ll be worth far more than £10 million. Liverpool want £20 million plus for Harry Wilson and I think Harrison is an even better player than him.
Yeah not much planning goes into our youngsters between age 18-22. That is a crucial age for players, there are various development for each players, not one thing fits all.
We have about a dozen out on loan, CFG clubs and others, but even of they do impress on loan there is rarely a way back to City first team.
Unless it is the Angelino way, which means we sell him , buy him, loan him, then loan him again to sell him later on with option to buy...
Harrison too, did very well for Leeds, we agreed to loan him again with a piss poor optional fee if he does well in PL he is easily a 25-30m worth of player and Leeds can get him for like 10m?
If he will be very shit which is unlikely at this point they just wont buy him.
We send 10 guy out on loan and even if they do very well and ready to make thee next step we do sideway loans for them again instead of stepping up with us at City or selling them for a stronger club than his loan club was with option to buy back.
Angelino ending up in a loan with lesser option fee than what he had, he just gave another assist this weekend, if he does very well for them they can buy him for even less next summer than the option they had this summer.
At least he is at a strong club playing regularly, but this is when Leipzig may buy him out for that 18m euros and same summer they could get buyers for him for 30-40m euros instead of us profiting...
I thought with options to buy as Angelino was and Harrison is neither side has to agree to buy / sell the player if Harrison does well there is nothing stopping us selling him to someone else or keeping him even if Leeds pay the option.
If Angelino meets the the requirements of the obligation to buy they have to bid for him but do we have to sell ? Lefts backs seem to be going cheap this year so the 2 million loan fee plus 16 million obligation looks good but last year would look cheap especially after such a good run in champions league
Either way I do not think the Angelino fee is that bad for a player basically cost nothing Tixi is getting stick for not getting 30 million for him even though no one bid for him even RB and No credit for his role in brining him the academy no credit for his role in selling him first time round or getting him back of credit for the loan fee or the obligation to buy
With Harrison its the same no credit for brining him here cheap no credit for any loan fees no credit for him improving and wont get any credit for selling him for whatever fee that is only stick for selling for perhaps a few million less than should even though no one is bidding
How much was Brewster
Apparently it’s £17 million rising to £23 million. He’s played 20 league games in his career, Jack Harrison has played 145. I don’t think £25 million would be unreasonable if he does well this season.