You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Adding to the Code of Conduct.
- Thread starter Mark - TheBlue
- Start date
andyhinch said:Could make you look like a bit of a **** thoughOvo said:You would be allowed to call a **** a ****.
That's why it works. Nobody is exempt.
dazdon
Well-Known Member
If I clicked the report button by mistake (Or just simply pissing about) is that an offence punishable by a ban?
<OCD kicking in>
<OCD kicking in>
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
Ducado said:themadinventor said:I would add a rule that says if 4 replies in a row have nothing to do with the thread title it gets locked, it's becoming more and more pointless reading thread titles because in a very short space of time they have morphed into something completely unrelated, usually a slanging match of some kind.
In our defence (all of the mods that is) we do try to stop this happening when we see it, by splitting topics etc, but if you feel it's getting out of hand, you can say something yourself (one of the great strengths of this forum is that by and large it moderates it's-self) or if you don't feel up to it, click the report button (its anonymous)
No need to defend yourself mate, I wasn't attacking you or the mods in general, I reckon you do a great job most of the time, I'm not asking for any changes (learnt my lesson from my "clean forum" rant), just saying what changes I'd like to see, answering the OP question.
To be fair some of the barny's that erupt can be very funny too.
themadinventor said:Ducado said:themadinventor said:I would add a rule that says if 4 replies in a row have nothing to do with the thread title it gets locked, it's becoming more and more pointless reading thread titles because in a very short space of time they have morphed into something completely unrelated, usually a slanging match of some kind.
In our defence (all of the mods that is) we do try to stop this happening when we see it, by splitting topics etc, but if you feel it's getting out of hand, you can say something yourself (one of the great strengths of this forum is that by and large it moderates it's-self) or if you don't feel up to it, click the report button (its anonymous)
No need to defend yourself mate, I wasn't attacking you or the mods in general, I reckon you do a great job most of the time, I'm not asking for any changes (learnt my lesson from my "clean forum" rant), just saying what changes I'd like to see, answering the OP question.
To be fair some of the barny's that erupt can be very funny too.
What he really means Ducado is that you're a ****
Banhammer time??? ;)
Lavinda Past
Well-Known Member
2sheikhs said:I agree.Lavinda Past said:I think anyone who posts while masturbating should be banned.
That should give the mods something to think about....
A 10 minute ban for that.
Can I come back on now?
jimharri
Moderator
Er; why would you want to ban hammer time? Granted, it's a shit song, but hardly ban-worthy.speccybob 8 said:themadinventor said:Ducado said:In our defence (all of the mods that is) we do try to stop this happening when we see it, by splitting topics etc, but if you feel it's getting out of hand, you can say something yourself (one of the great strengths of this forum is that by and large it moderates it's-self) or if you don't feel up to it, click the report button (its anonymous)
No need to defend yourself mate, I wasn't attacking you or the mods in general, I reckon you do a great job most of the time, I'm not asking for any changes (learnt my lesson from my "clean forum" rant), just saying what changes I'd like to see, answering the OP question.
To be fair some of the barny's that erupt can be very funny too.
What he really means Ducado is that you're a ****
Banhammer time??? ;)
TBH, it's more than some of them. The sure signs are, someone could start a thread about favourite jacket potato fillings that gets 3 responses in an hour. Then you check back in another hour and it has 10 pages, you know there's trouble at t'mill.themadinventor said:Ducado said:themadinventor said:I would add a rule that says if 4 replies in a row have nothing to do with the thread title it gets locked, it's becoming more and more pointless reading thread titles because in a very short space of time they have morphed into something completely unrelated, usually a slanging match of some kind.
In our defence (all of the mods that is) we do try to stop this happening when we see it, by splitting topics etc, but if you feel it's getting out of hand, you can say something yourself (one of the great strengths of this forum is that by and large it moderates it's-self) or if you don't feel up to it, click the report button (its anonymous)
No need to defend yourself mate, I wasn't attacking you or the mods in general, I reckon you do a great job most of the time, I'm not asking for any changes (learnt my lesson from my "clean forum" rant), just saying what changes I'd like to see, answering the OP question.
To be fair some of the barny's that erupt can be very funny too.
Lavinda Past
Well-Known Member
It's a f*ckin BARM.
No. Another 5 minute ban for not washing your hands.Lavinda Past said:2sheikhs said:I agree.Lavinda Past said:I think anyone who posts while masturbating should be banned.
That should give the mods something to think about....
A 10 minute ban for that.
Can I come back on now?