Aguero banned for three games (updated)

[CitizenTID]

I knew the answer too.


Those posters are clearly wrong then, or just being fucking provocative for the sake of an argument.

Need to get to supersavers for some bluer tints I say. Honestly though, anyone denying the rags within the media pushed this to put pressure on the FA are going over the top in trying to be unbiased.

 

[Tricky Dickys Right Foot Shot]

A strong Manchester United, is good for the Premier League. Remember who said that.
Sky are selling the Premier League. Course they have a fucking interest.

Yet 90% of pundits have backed us to win it so I'm not sure what you're getting at?

 

[Jamoid]

Like it...... That's how Maureeniho will set up against us

 

[BlumerMooner]

Mate, I feel as though I need to repeat myself because it is literally embarrassing that people thing the media are bias towards United, this has been an on going thing that some of our fans actually believe in for the last 10 years..... I honestly don't understand what SKY or the BBC would gain favouring United, I honestly don't... It's a conspiracist nut jobs theory

Boooooo

 

[Feed the Elk]

He's obviously looking straight at it, it's clear as day.

However, assuming he wasn't looking at it, if I were a referee's assessor I'd be wanting to know why not?

In his defence it happened very quickly and was missable to the human eye - Sky are there to pick out potential controversy and escalate it in line with their profile, which is what they've done here

 

[Goatmeal]

Move on guys. It's a 3 game ban for sure.
Could have been worse. Could have got sent off on the day and wham may have got back into it.
It might prevent him picking up is usual 6 week injury about now.
He has a knock now which could have seen him miss rags game. He most likely would not have played in cup anyway.
We should beat Bournmouth without him.
I still think we will storm the league this season anyway. You can smell the fear in the opposition already.

 

[CitizenTID]

Mate, I feel as though I need to repeat myself because it is literally embarrassing that people thing the media are bias towards United, this has been an on going thing that some of our fans actually believe in for the last 10 years..... I honestly don't understand what SKY or the BBC would gain favouring United, I honestly don't... It's a conspiracist nut jobs theory

We aren't saying that Sky and the BBC as organisations have an agenda or bias - it is people who work for them with positions to make their wants happen. There's an abundance of rag drivel articles with things to do with City.

You don't think the content of media outlets would be biased? Look at Marca and Mundo Deportivo ffs. Football fans work in football journalism.

 

[Len Rum]

Mate, I feel as though I need to repeat myself because it is literally embarrassing that people thing the media are bias towards United, this has been an on going thing that some of our fans actually believe in for the last 10 years..... I honestly don't understand what SKY or the BBC would gain favouring United, I honestly don't... It's a conspiracist nut jobs theory

Err....for more viewers, hits on web sites etc.
Or are you being sarcastic?

 

[prestonibbo_mcfc]

Yet 90% of pundits have backed us to win it so I'm not sure what you're getting at?

What have pundits go to do with the control of the game and whether United get a better press/showing by SKY.

 

[beano46]

Simon Bajkowski who wrote the story for the Muen is furiously pulling his pud at the prospect for an Agureo ban yet strangely defends the fuck out of Fellaini when he does the same thing only ten times worse.