You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Aguero banned for three games (updated)
- Thread starter citytill1die84
- Start date
johnmc
Well-Known Member
Personally think City are gambling-Kun is injured and may miss a few games, so nothing to lose. And, Mariner is a liar.
Rags will have to prepare for us with and without him for another day at least.
marco
Well-Known Member
He caught him on the jaw. Plus it's irrelevant if he did or didn't. The fact he went for Reid with his elbow is enough.
Our only reason for appeal for me is that the ref must have seen it and took no action.
bang on correct,,i don't think we are contesting if he's guilty or not, it's about how the law is being applied and that's through lies, i can't see how we can prove it though or indeed how Marriner can prove he didn't see it, if this was a court case and marriner had been driving down the road and killed a pedestrian in front of his car at the same distance as Aguero he'd be bang up for undue care and attention, the judge would not buy it that he never seen the pedestrian
Last edited:
johnmc
Well-Known Member
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,068
Lol. Stop it. Not everyone knows you like to fish.Google search. Aguero Reid. Images. Plain to see.
pml79
Well-Known Member
It's a yellow card at the most that's what it will get knocked down to its handbags nothing moreGoogle search. Aguero Reid. Images. Plain to see.
Google search. Aguero Reid. Images. Plain to see.
Not a pop John,from what I've seen there is no contact with the elbow,intent was there,IMO.....I've seen various comments from..."in the throat" "nearly smashed his cheekbone" "straight on the Vera",and now yours "on the jaw"......yet someone 5 yards away,seen nothing.
As I've said,not a pop.
pml79
Well-Known Member
You need to look at it the other angle only.his forearm touches his neck
prestonibbo_mcfc
Well-Known Member
bang on correct,,i don't think we are contesting if he's guilty or not, it's about how the law is being applied and that's through lies, i can't see how we can prove it though or indeed how Marriner can prove he didn't see it, if this was a court case and marriner had been driving down the road and killed a pedestrian in front of his car at the same distance as Aguero he'd be bang up for manslaughter the judge would not buy it that he never saw the pedestrian
Think that's undue care and attention ?
MadchesterCity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 18,133
Google search. Aguero Reid. Images. Plain to see.
come on wtf with the video cameras now it's easy to make him look guilty
Aguero said no contact and no intent so i'm happy with that!