Alan Henning - how should we respond?

daveiw1976 said:
hilts said:
Shame really, we will fight and beat them and back at home the tensions will rise, inevitable really

Not sure that we will beat them per sais.

I meant in terms of killing this lot as opposed to eradicating nutters with strange beliefs
 
hilts said:
I meant in terms of killing this lot as opposed to eradicating nutters with strange beliefs

Sadly, as history has told us many times "eradicating nutters with strange beliefs" is far from easy - long term.

Though establishing who those nutters are is far from foolproof! :P
 
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
Easy.nuke the fuckers.bollocks to colateral damage.enough is enough.

Please can people stop fucking saying this.

Do you have any idea how many peaceful innocent people will be affected by a nuclear bomb?

The same people who are at this moment asking for our help.

We need troops on the ground.
 
The 'Little Boy' atomic bomb from Enola Gay in 1945 was 16 Kilotons. We've all seen the footage of Hiroshima, and the death tolls from the blast and radiation are there to be seen. The US today have nuclear bombs that are 100+ Kilotons and some maybe up to 500 Kilotons.
 
TangerineSteve17 said:
The 'Little Boy' atomic bomb from Enola Gay in 1945 was 16 Kilotons. We've all seen the footage of Hiroshima, and the death tolls from the blast and radiation are there to be seen. The US today have nuclear bombs that are 100+ Kilotons and some maybe up to 500 Kilotons.
I don't take anyone seriously when they shout 'nuke em'. It must just be an emotional response. I want those fuckers stamped out but that's not the way.
 
dronefromsector7g said:
TangerineSteve17 said:
The 'Little Boy' atomic bomb from Enola Gay in 1945 was 16 Kilotons. We've all seen the footage of Hiroshima, and the death tolls from the blast and radiation are there to be seen. The US today have nuclear bombs that are 100+ Kilotons and some maybe up to 500 Kilotons.
I don't take anyone seriously when they shout 'nuke em'. It must just be an emotional response. I want those fuckers stamped out but that's not the way.
Agreed.

How you can want to avenge the deaths of hundreds of innocents with the death of thousands of innocents I don't know.

Eliminate the threat, not half the fucking world.
 
TangerineSteve17 said:
The 'Little Boy' atomic bomb from Enola Gay in 1945 was 16 Kilotons. We've all seen the footage of Hiroshima, and the death tolls from the blast and radiation are there to be seen. The US today have nuclear bombs that are 100+ Kilotons and some maybe up to 500 Kilotons.

If we're being totally honest, nuking an area is in some way equivalent to salting the earth many moons ago, but even then it was nation v nation now it's worse - it's religion, much much harder to rationalise.

For what it's worth, I would denounce ALL religions tomorrow, from then on we may have a real chance to focus on the future.
 
its a safe bet that all on here realise it would be impossible to carry out such an attack with a nuke, now remember the napalm that's the stuff that sorts the men out from the boys, torch the little fukers and let them burn in agony like ants, a slow painful death that's whats required here
 
marco said:
its a safe bet that all on here realise it would be impossible to carry out such an attack with a nuke, now remember the napalm that's the stuff that sorts the men out from the boys, torch the little fukers and let them burn in agony like ants, a slow painful death that's whats required here
No, because that makes martyrs out of people.

These scumbag radicals just need to be taken off the grid. Permanently.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.