You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain
- Thread starter CityFan94
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Just not very good. Powerful runner, poor decision maker and average ability. Could have become a good player but years wasted at Arsenal hav left him a very average, injury prone player who has wasted his best years of development
Cheadle_hulmeBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2012
- Messages
- 16,987
Just not very good. Powerful runner, poor decision maker and average ability. Could have become a good player but years wasted at Arsenal hav left him a very average, injury prone player who has wasted his best years of development
hes only 23 isn't he ? got plenty of years of development left.
He's a 23 year old player who is all about his physicality, who is already being let down by his body. 23 isn't young, especially for someone in his positionhes only 23 isn't he ? got plenty of years of development left.
Cheadle_hulmeBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2012
- Messages
- 16,987
He's a 23 year old player who is all about his physicality, who is already being let down by his body. 23 isn't young, especially for someone in his position
sterling and stones are only a year younger and they are classed as developing talents tbf. i think that could be more to do with arsenals medical/training regime, they are awful for injuries
The Riot Club
Well-Known Member
Would rather sign Walcott, but Ox isn't bad, he's definitely an upgrade on Navas.
That's because they are developing, at least Sterling is. Chamberlain isn't developing, he's standing still, if not moving backwards and has been for 5 years. He's pretty much where Rodwell was when we signed him, a failed prospect who never kicked on and never managed to stay fit long enough to put a decent season under his belt.sterling and stones are only a year younger and they are classed as developing talents tbf. i think that could be more to do with arsenals medical/training regime, they are awful for injuries
Mikejl
Well-Known Member
As a teenager he looked the next big thing just like Walcott, oh and Wilshire, hmm, noticed a theme there in his lack of development, maybe the bluds on Arsenal TV have a point. Maybe one of those cockroach journalists who spend too much time sucking PEGs cock could look at how good players stagnate and deteriorate under Wenger?
Cheadle_hulmeBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2012
- Messages
- 16,987
That's because they are developing, at least Sterling is. Chamberlain isn't developing, he's standing still, if not moving backwards and has been for 5 years. He's pretty much where Rodwell was when we signed him, a failed prospect who never kicked on and never managed to stay fit long enough to put a decent season under his belt.
under pep i think he could fulfill his potential. if pep thinks hes good enough then thats enough for me. we are just gonna have to disagree mate
That's because they are developing, at least Sterling is. Chamberlain isn't developing, he's standing still, if not moving backwards and has been for 5 years. He's pretty much where Rodwell was when we signed him, a failed prospect who never kicked on and never managed to stay fit long enough to put a decent season under his belt.
Not true, he's clearly developing as he's probably been Arsenal's best player since moving into midfield in January. So he's playing better than ever and in a new position...pretty much the definition of developing.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.