Alexander Isak | Cried his way to a £130m move

He signed a contract so fuck him and fuck the murdering cunts club is my honest opinion..
Let the **** rot before giving in to him joining the murderers..
You did it with Dick Van over hyped but Newcastle shouldn't give in to your shitstain of a club
Top comment
 
Haven't a clue but he's obviously under the impression that he was told he could leave. Haven't a clue if that's true or what the circumstances were that he could leave under, or if he's just talking shit.
His behavior makes it hard for me to give him the benefit of the doubt. He's definitely not chosen to take the high road...
 
A player has every right to run down their contract and leave on a free (Bosman Ruling), but if they're under contract the club can demand whatever they want for the player.
Until we get another 'Bosman' and we get release clauses being mandatory.

I don't have an issue with asking for a fee, my point is that agents and players will be less inclined to go there if a club seems to be difficult to deal with. Especially IF the club went back on an agreement with the player and then he ends up rotting in the reserves/at home!

It is not about who is right who is wrong, it is now about who can come out looking the best. IF Newcastle sell him for £130m - 135m for example, they will likely come out looking best, on the eye.
 
Until we get another 'Bosman' and we get release clauses being mandatory.

I don't have an issue with asking for a fee, my point is that agents and players will be less inclined to go there if a club seems to be difficult to deal with. Especially IF the club went back on an agreement with the player and then he ends up rotting in the reserves/at home!

It is not about who is right who is wrong, it is now about who can come out looking the best. IF Newcastle sell him for £130m - 135m for example, they will likely come out looking best, on the eye.

Have Liverpool struggled to sign players since refusing Arsenals bid for Suarez?

Didn’t think so
 
Why would garnacho want to move to Chelsea over Bayern? Strange logic.
 
He is the one making himself not considered for selection, this is completely different.

If he shows up to training and plays, that's what Newcastle would prefer and all of this would have been alot more ammicable.
You are both making the same point
 
His behavior makes it hard for me to give him the benefit of the doubt. He's definitely not chosen to take the high road...

If he is desperate to go because he feels some deep and burning betrayal you'd think he would be willing to put in a transfer request and forego a loyalty bonus that will be dwarfed by a signing fee he shouldn't even have been entitled to for 3 years.
 
If he is desperate to go because he feels some deep and burning betrayal you'd think he would be willing to put in a transfer request and forego a loyalty bonus that will be dwarfed by a signing fee he shouldn't even have been entitled to for 3 years.

Be funny of he does, and Newcastle reject his transfer request. Then he loses the bonus, and gets to stay too.

I didn't really have any issues with this move, but now I want to see it fall through, for his own actions.
 
Have Liverpool struggled to sign players since refusing Arsenals bid for Suarez?

Didn’t think so
So you didn't see our attempts to replace him? The following summer. It was only when Klopp arrived that things changed.
 
Wanker. Will embarrass himself and the club publicly with shit like this but won’t put in an official transfer request because it’d supposedly waive a, get this, loyalty bonus.


He is a complete tosser, him and the dippers deserve each other.

What a whiney little child.
 
Going to be a bit tasty in the NE on Monday evening.
5 days of more pot stirring.

It will probably be resolved on deadline day with Liverpool paying a fortune, and then Newcastle acting like City in the 2008 window with the cash they suddenly have.
 
Until we get another 'Bosman' and we get release clauses being mandatory.

I don't have an issue with asking for a fee, my point is that agents and players will be less inclined to go there if a club seems to be difficult to deal with. Especially IF the club went back on an agreement with the player and then he ends up rotting in the reserves/at home!

It is not about who is right who is wrong, it is now about who can come out looking the best. IF Newcastle sell him for £130m - 135m for example, they will likely come out looking best, on the eye.
Newcastle haven't looked unreasonable at any point, Howe has said he has had talks with Isak early doors, it seems it got to a point where people higher need to deal with it, or in other words this mard arsed **** was a dick enough that the manager that has turned him into a £150M player felt he could no longer resolve the situation and lelft the club to deal with it.

Isak has been accomodated, spared media intrution and initially was allowed to train alone and miss pre season, he or his agent subsiquently have used Romano and Onstien as mouthpieces while also refusing return to the squad now the season has srarted.

He hasn't officially put in a transfer request by all acounts as she would lose certain payments and fees, wants the geordies to accept a bid rather than ask to leave himself officially.

Scousers stump up the £150M or let the **** rot a season on the sidelines and his world cup hopes die.

only person here who has ruined their reputation is Isak, what club wants a tosser with his attitude, even. some scpuse fans are now not so keen.
 
Last edited:
So you didn't see our attempts to replace him? The following summer. It was only when Klopp arrived that things changed.
Are you really trying to suggest players wouldn’t sign for you because of the Suarez rejection but as soon as you got Klopp players changed your mind and were happy to join again?

The mental gymnastics to justify how Liverpool and Isak aren’t doing anything wrong is crazy. Have a good night pal, I’m clearly speaking to a nutter.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top