Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 69,455
at your service Popcorn Cat View attachment 166653

at your service Popcorn Cat View attachment 166653

It will be good viewing as long as we do the business against spuds.Newcastle vs Liverpool at SJP on Monday will be fucking fiery
Mahrez forced Leicester to sell him so we could sign him. He refused to stay. He put in a transfer request and did interviews saying he’s “fiercely ambitious” Leicester wanted almost 100 mil, the deal was practically impossible until he pushed for the move a lot.We have been linked all summer to him, yet is he throwing his toys out the pram? It's very rarely a player we are linked to or sign behaves this way. Nunes was one. But the club would usually question the character of someone acting this way and don't look to disrupt a club - it's not how we do business.
What's to say Isak doesn't do the exact same thing if Barca or Real come knocking in a couple of years?
He has a better chance of success at the dippers and will get more money but Newcastle have helped him make his name and he has three years left on his contract. They've hardly treated him badly.
Brothers in poor etiquette...Totally agree, he's behaved like a spoilt child and spat his dummy out.
Liverpool are the biggest cunts though, not only have they unsettled him, they rubbed the Geordies faces in it by signing Ekitike as well.
Saying that Wissa is doing exactly the same at Brentford so he can get a move to Newcastle.
It’s amazing they they just don’t see it .. or they have skin like a fucking elephantAhh of course the Liverpool fan sees the human in all this.
Ever the humanitarians aren’t you? fighting for the little guy, the potato famine sufferers (2025), or the bottle throwers.
This is your **** of a club’s fault by the way, tapping him up and refusing to meet a clubs evaluation of him and letting him make an utter twat of himself. So well done!
Newcastle basically saying he's lying:
I'm inclined to believe the club to be honest. None of the timelines make sense from Isak's perspective.
He's been tapped up by Liverpool during the summer and is now trying to force it.
If a club comes to an agreement with a player, then changes their mind. Making the player see out their contract, in whatever way they see fit, all the work they have done improving the prospects of the club, are taking a huge hit.
Some posters are letting their hearts overrule their head. Imagine you're a talented footballer and your dream is to play for City.
You're offered the chance to join a club, that took the step of forcing a player to see out 3 years of his contract, when he declared his desire to leave.
You are also offered the chance to join Aston Villa. You are destined to be the star player but are on a 5 year deal.
In that scenario, which club would you rather be at, when City come calling 2 years into your contract?
If a club comes to an agreement with a player, then changes their mind. Making the player see out their contract, in whatever way they see fit, all the work they have done improving the prospects of the club, are taking a huge hit.
Some posters are letting their hearts overrule their head. Imagine you're a talented footballer and your dream is to play for City.
You're offered the chance to join a club, that took the step of forcing a player to see out 3 years of his contract, when he declared his desire to leave.
You are also offered the chance to join Aston Villa. You are destined to be the star player but are on a 5 year deal.
In that scenario, which club would you rather be at, when City come calling 2 years into your contract?
No they won't.If isak doesn’t go back to Newcastle theyll be in their right to sue him for 150m