Alexander Isak | Cried his way to a £130m move

ancoats said:
City gets both absolutely slaughtered by the Red shirt tabloids for Spending and Winning Silverware and CHEATING
Yet Liverpool settled out of Court when Manchester City found somebody from Liverpool FC hacking into our accounts
and when we reported it to the Premier League they thought it was in our best interests to settle out of court

BOY. I wish Manchester City could reopen the case and take them to the cleaners
Click to expand...
Let’s not forget as well that they only passed ffp one year because uefa gave them a £50m allowance for new stadium plans for a new stadium that never happened, cheating Scouse cunts
 
vincent said:
Possibly. Assume you have the correct numbers then to state categorically they’re wrong.
Click to expand...

I posted them in an earlier reaponse. And that's just off the bbc headlines, not hand picking what to add and deductn where. But I am not here for Liverpool though mate.
 
Coatigan said:
What, the I love Liverpool add-ons?

All that is clearly wrong mate, whoever it is by.
Click to expand...
It is by far the most accurate club buying/selling site.
It includes all transfers for all levels of the team. PL, PL2 and U18.
It includes any sell-ons, for when the sell-on transfer occurred. Ie reduces the value of the current sale’s value for the seller.
It includes any add-ons for when they are triggered.

Not sure why you think it’s wrong
See http://valuball.co
 
Last edited:
Coatigan said:
I posted them in an earlier reaponse. And that's just off the bbc headlines, not hand picking what to add and deductn where. But I am not here for Liverpool though mate.
Click to expand...

Me neither. The point being the money spent this transfer window is insane. But most clubs (except Arsenal and United) have recouped huge amounts and the net spend for most clubs is nowhere near the headline numbers.
 
vincent said:
Me neither. The point being the money spent this transfer window is insane. But most clubs (except Arsenal and United) have recouped huge amounts and the net spend for most clubs is nowhere near the headline numbers.
Click to expand...

Yeah that is indeed a valid point, and I have acknowledged as much. But the figure you used is a good 100m out.

My point also stands, tha the moneybwe spend is preaented differently and nobody ever mentions our net. Pep had to spell it out a few times, when we signed Grealish for example.
 
JASR said:
It is by far the most accurate club buying/selling site.
It includes all transfers for all levels of the team. PL, PL2 and U18.
It includes any sell-ons, for when the sell-on transfer occurred.
It includes any add-ons for when they are triggered.

Not sure why you think it’s wrong
See http://valuball.co
Click to expand...

Well it is clearly not, if it is 100m out on Liverpool's transfers, and 15m out in the opposite direction on one of our transfers and that's just two posters pointing it out with a quick glance.
 
Master-Lotus said:
I know they are not but this a ruthless business, we all know that.
I highly doubt there is no interest whatsoever in Ederson, Ortega, Gundogan, Kovacic, Bernardo, Ake, Stones and Akanji. They are old but still decent for most clubs. Not good enough for us anymore though. We need to rebuild.
Click to expand...
It must be so frustrating for you that pep, khaldoon and viana are not able to grasp this. Sometimes it's almost like the senior management at city don't even play football manager or FIFA on their Xbox.
 
Haaland94 said:
We should be focusing on our own transfers. Who cares if they get Isak, most likely they will because unlike us, they've been ruthless in the transfer window.
Click to expand...
Init not guarantee that mard arse is going to have an easy ride anyway after this summer!
 
Coatigan said:
Well it is clearly not, if it is 100m out on Liverpool's transfers, and 15m out in the opposite direction on one of our transfers and that's just two posters pointing it out with a quick glance.
Click to expand...


Its my site along with KM - Which fee in your mind is incorrect ?

I put a source (via most reported media sources) per every transfer so if any of these are incorrect tell me and ill adjust.
1756545015454.png

Man City below as well as most would be more familiar here with them (as I am :) )

1756544996432.png
 

Attachments

  • 1756545000356.png
    1756545000356.png
    129.4 KB · Views: 9
Sheikh rattle and roll said:
You make it sound so easy but it’s not
Akanji lives in Wilmslow he likes it here his family are here he has a contract so any deal also need to suit him
How would you like it if I told you you’re moving to Gretna Green next week
Click to expand...
It would be a fucking joy to behold for every Blue Mooner and I would drive the fucker there ... in my car boot though and gagged.
 
BlueBrain said:
Its my site along with KM - Which fee in your mind is incorrect ?

I put a source (via most reported media sources) per every transfer so if any of these are incorrect tell me and ill adjust.
View attachment 167943

Man City below as well as most would be more familiar here with them (as I am :) )

View attachment 167941
Click to expand...

Fair play on the time and effort put into it. The first one I googled, Reijnders, not seeing any add-ons mentioned in the first 3 articles, all just quote a 46m fee. Darwin, seeing the base fee, no add-ons.
I get various outlets put different reports out.

Looking at BBC's and Sky's headline figures, their net spend still comes out as 160m+. Crazy that add-ons can drop that by 100m!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top