gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
He's only a semi-spineless ****, then.Boris has agreed to join the BBC debate but ran away from the Channel 4 one.
Happy to take soft questions of Matliss but scared of taking tough ones off Snow.
He's only a semi-spineless ****, then.Boris has agreed to join the BBC debate but ran away from the Channel 4 one.
Happy to take soft questions of Matliss but scared of taking tough ones off Snow.
It's not a game at all. It's a perfectly simple question that you could answer in equally simple terms. Yes or no would suffice.
That's not an answer, it's a comment.I did answer it in simple terms. It's childish and tiresome.
Oh go on then, it’s an easy one.It's not a game at all. It's a perfectly simple question that you could answer in equally simple terms. Yes or no would suffice.
That's not an answer, it's a comment.
It's not remotely the same, and you're conflating two separate issues. If you want to criticise him if he doesn't appear, that's perfectly valid to do so. What isn't, is what Sky did earlier to try and promote their own campaign for leadership debates by pretending it was identical. It is possible to be critical if he doesn't appear without buying into the Sky self-promotion agenda.
How is a group of people who want to be PM having a TV debate, not similar to a pre-general election debate?
Because it isn't a national election we vote in.
Mine was manifestly a question (please note the question mark), rather than a comment.As was yours. That's the point. When did you stop beating your wife?
160,000 Tory members do. And they should have the chance to scrutinize them, and also gauge the public reaction to them. Because just like a general election, the winner of this content is going to be the fucking prime minister.
Mine was manifestly a question (please note the question mark), rather than a comment.