SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,064
Totally agreeNo I realised that later, but its what it should be saying.
Totally agreeNo I realised that later, but its what it should be saying.
Agree. Fortunately it isn't happening either way.I would be gutted if we let Raheem go and think it would be a bad deal even as a straight swap let alone plus 30-50M.!
Sanchez is a better finisher and arguably as quick as Sterling when he's on it especially around the box.
The major difference is the football brain though Sanchez has one.
Pep is working on Raheem but I feel that is natural only so much can be trained.
You're late to the party. This time yesterday some were saying throwing their toys out the pram, calling Pep a fraud and that they hoped Sanchez flopped rather than seeing the story for the bollocks it was.Not sure why any Blues choose to believe this Sterling bollox.
I didn't see that.. Lol I can go to work with a smile on my face now.You're late to the party. This time yesterday some were saying throwing their toys out the pram, calling Pep a fraud and that they hoped Sanchez flopped rather than seeing the story for the bollocks it was.
Threads move so fast, I sometimes jump a few dozen pages. On this occasion, I'm glad I did!You're late to the party. This time yesterday some were saying throwing their toys out the pram, calling Pep a fraud and that they hoped Sanchez flopped rather than seeing the story for the bollocks it was.