I don't think clubs announce that they hadn't signed someone do they?
When it's dead, City will get out in front of it and use Mullock or Blackburn to release the story.
I don't think clubs announce that they hadn't signed someone do they?
Don't get your hopes high. Pep will not be fuming at Txiki anytime soon. Transfers became a very complicated business, and no one here could claim they know all detail of what has been going on in this transfer or others.If I were Pep I'd be fuming at Txiki.
Pissed about with Alves and we got shown up, now pissed about leaving it last minute for Alexis. . . Fuck's sake.
I hear you, personally I think this is going to happen. If they kept him it would be a nightmare for them the rest of the seasonAs John Smith is supposed to be fairly reliable, I took this to mean City told him they haven't heard anything from Arsenal because this is all a smokescreen for them to save face.
So playing nicey nicey comes before signing a player and winning trophies?You've considered the very real possibility that Pep and our owners may have asked Sanchez not to kick up a public stink, of course? Given that our owners use City to promote the UAE and hate negatively publicity, and then add in the relish with which the media loves to try and tarnish our reputation, and I'd say City having told Sanchez not to go down the route of transfer requests and strikes is a very likely eventuality
My conclusion too.
Our chase for Jamie Pollock got me hard, I cannot deny it.
Do you know something?Expect the odds to shift in our favour again in the coming hours