SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,069
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Alexis Sanchez
- Thread starter Decepticon
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
Don't see where they would play him.
Wouldn't surprise me if they sell Neymar to Real Madrid, once the World Cup is over.
Unless Arsenal severely drop their valuation I can't see it. He's free in 5 months and as good a player as he is, we have more pressing needs on other areas of the pitch. If they want 10-15m then sure, otherwise I'd say fuck off you made your bed, we will sign him for free in a few months.
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
We don't know what City's budget is or whether the rumoured fee for VVD is as high as stated (if we are in for him).
But we do know, that Arsenal are a bunch of money grabbing shithouses, so the idea of us not being arsed about signing Sanchez now & Sanchez being happy to wait & then come to us for nothing, may actually mean they offer him to us now, for a cheaper price than they were hoping to negotiate & perhaps we can actually afford to do both.
But we do know, that Arsenal are a bunch of money grabbing shithouses, so the idea of us not being arsed about signing Sanchez now & Sanchez being happy to wait & then come to us for nothing, may actually mean they offer him to us now, for a cheaper price than they were hoping to negotiate & perhaps we can actually afford to do both.
@BluePhil8
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 13,425
Yep, this too. Could see them begging us to do a deal for £20m on deadline day next month.We don't know what City's budget is or whether the rumoured fee for VVD is as high as stated (if we are in for him).
But we do know, that Arsenal are a bunch of money grabbing shithouses, so the idea of us not being arsed about signing Sanchez now & Sanchez being happy to wait & then come to us for nothing, may actually mean they offer him to us now, for a cheaper price than they were hoping to negotiate & perhaps we can actually afford to do both.
Sir peace frog
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 18,534
- Location
- stalking the canals and rivers
- Team supported
- Manchester City Football Club
that works out at £5 million a month ,tell them to fuck off, give him to us for £5m or we will see him in juneYep, this too. Could see them begging us to do a deal for £20m on deadline day next month.
@BluePhil8
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 13,425
I agree but think the club would do a deal if it was about £15m. Tbh the way they fucked everything up in the Summer City are probably happier to wait than do business with arse again.that works out at £5 million a month ,tell them to fuck off, give him to us for £5m or we will see him in june
St.Pauli support
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 5,137
For obvious reasons City have to say they are happy to wait.
That's why I was asking if Sanchez would be happy, too.
Finally he does play some role in this transfer...
That's why I was asking if Sanchez would be happy, too.
Finally he does play some role in this transfer...
bluemoon32
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 24,867
- Team supported
- City
Quite happy to wait until the summer, he's looked disinterested for Arsenal and it wouldn't be easy for him to suddenly up his game half through a season.
Barcon
Well-Known Member
Wew, I didn't mean to upset you. Wasn't an attack. I didn't expect you to have read the whole thread or anything, it was just an observation about how nearly every time I check out the thread I've seen the question asked. As for answering it, it had already been answered for you so I didn't see a need to repeat.
Don't fuck with Charlie Brown.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.