kaz7
Well-Known Member
6 months nearer to being a free agent,the rags is clouding everyones vision here as is the hatred
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Alexis Sanchez
- Thread starter Decepticon
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
TheThirdDeano
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 8,761
Would lose my shit if City announced Sanchez in the squad
Doesn't matter, quadruple is still on. Let the doubters regret their choices come the end of the season...and the next season...and the season after that...and so on. This club is not one to rest. They know what it takes to keep Pep at the club. If we lose Sanchez, we'll sign a better player in the summer. Have faith in Pep, the club and the players.
PragueBlue
Well-Known Member
I'm pretty sure no one's saying we can't afford him. It's more of we will buy him for price A and if he reaches price B, we might as well fork out and invest on better options on lower wages and more years ahead of him.
IMO that is the correct way to run the club.
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
It isn`t just £20M though is it ?While I also understand the clubs current stance, it begs the question why we thought he was worth £60m in the summer. In the space of 4 months he has gone from arguably our number 1 transfer target, to a guy that we are not willing to pay more than £20m for. I feel that it was either a short-sighted, over-priced, stupid move in the summer, or we are now cutting off our nose to spite our face.
remember arthur mann
Well-Known Member
Think the Chilean miners visiting the swamp have swung it !!
bluesilver
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Apr 2011
- Messages
- 607
Funny, i had just gotten used to him poss being at City-I don't care for him (Chile more than Arse) but can't deny he's a great player. Saying this, if he signs for rags, I look forward to his agitation every time City win or accomplishes anything.
Maybe the wages would've effected the team now. His presence def would've (Sergio, Sane/Sterling). I believe Pep could've controlled the egos, but $ is always harder to manage. I trust in our mgmt/Pep.
Maybe the wages would've effected the team now. His presence def would've (Sergio, Sane/Sterling). I believe Pep could've controlled the egos, but $ is always harder to manage. I trust in our mgmt/Pep.
I may be very wrong in the end, but I’d much rather have a 29 year old Sanchez than a 19 year old Mbappe. Of course that’s because I’m very unconvinced by the latter.But unlikely to be a 29 year old .
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
I'm not so certain that he would not have been worth £70m.
I wouldn't have paid 60 personally.
I'm not sure we would be anywhere near as good now, if we'd signed him.
I think he would have held Sane & Sterling back. They have developed immensely (so much so I'm not convinced he will start as much as some think,over them if we do sign him).
- Status
- Not open for further replies.