EL APACHE TEVEZ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 21,864
Greedy twat Milner playing in midfield today ;)
This.We agreed an acceptable fee, £60m, for both parties in the summer.
It didn't happen because it was agreed late and Arsenal were unable to attract a replacement.
We were hacked off with Arsenal and tried to punish them by offering them a fee significantly below his value, because we believed he would only come to us. We declared we would not increase the fee. This was our big mistake.
If we had not done this I don't believe United would have got involved. No club wants to be rejected when they bid for a player. They knew we had an agreement with AS.
Sanchez's team were frightened we were prepared to leave him at Arsenal until summer and they started looking for alternative buyers.
I take your point on Sane & Sterling but in terms of market valuation, I think Sanchez would have been value at £70m. What would have occurred in terms of performances is hypothetical but our results couldn't have been much better.
This is hardly the end of the world but it is another major transfer we have not pulled off. I know we can win them all and I am more than happy with a lot of our signings but I'm not sure our success rate on the big ones is as good as it could / should be - hard to measure though.
I think this is a point that shouldn't be overlooked. At the theatre of debt they don't give a shit at the disparity in wages but it could prove fatal to the team-spirit if we started this billy big-bollocks salary kind of stuff.So we sign Alexis pay what they want so he ends up on £400k a week.
Currently we are trying to sort out a contract with Kev. He’s our best player so will no doubt want parity so we more than double his wages and put him on £400k a week.
We are also looking at extending Sterling, Sane contracts. Sterling is flying this season so are we looking at £250k for him now or is that not enough? Sane has contributed highly too so £200k for Sane.
The knock-on effect would be ridiculous.
Txiki bad, he did things Mancini blamed Marwood for.According to some people, Txiki is to blame for literally everything that happens, doesn't happen, or perhaps might happen.
Didn't say anything had been, did I?Why, what has been announced?
Your wasting your breath mate.The idea of us 'punishing' Arsenal, has come about on places like this.
If we were prepared to leave him at Arsenal, it's because Pep is no longer really that bothered about signing him.
Utd would have bid, in this window & Sanchez' agent would have spoken to them, you do not 'blank' Utd, much as it is made a joke of, on here.
If Sanchez wants to come to City, he can do. It is upto him.
But perhaps he didn't want him at " any price " ?