Alexis Sanchez

[VinceYoungisaBLUE]

Can we have Rashford? Think he'd be good under Pep

 

[TCIB]

Can we have Rashford? Think he'd be good under Pep

This is a clarkie right?

 

[TravisBickle]

I love City’s stance on this.
If it’s titles he wants there is only one choice to make.
If he chooses Utd over us at this moment in time then its all about the money, I don’t care what any rag fucker says.

 

[117 M34]

Remember the banner

Our players make history, your players make money

 

[ScottSinclair]

Imagine if Alexis refuses to go to United. I dont actually think we desperatly need him, but holy shit, that would be the greatest thing ever

 

[Bill]

Remember the banner

Our players make history, your players make money

Lol thought about that myself.
It always comes back to haunt you.

 

[Young Blue]

Give over "cover up" lol, the deal wasn't deemed good value at those prices it's that simple, we were his first choice all we had to do was match their offer but we didn't want to.

Time will tell on this decision but I don't see United winning the title off the back of this signing alone this season or the next. It's not just the transfer fee it's the wages, signing fee, agent fee, whatever bonuses and incentives he was offered and when you add it all up it's not the bargain you or Sam Lee are hyping it up to be, it also has the possibility to cause problems with the rest of the squad and future signings when one player gets a deal like that(something that should not be overlooked it's very significant the unrest that could cause). Those of you sulking about it can argue none of it matters 'til the cows come home but it all matters even to the big clubs(bar Real). They don't even know if he will settle, I suspect he will given his character but it's not a given either.

The deal only went out of reach, "at those prices" when United got involved. We had already agreed lower personal terms, that both sides were happy with.

If we had just payed Arsenal's fee instead of trying to low ball them, Sanchez's agent would have stuck with us, as he did in summer. United would have known, like with PSG and Bayern he only wanted us.

The agent felt he was being forced to offer Sanchez to other clubs because we let it be known we would only pay £20m. That was the flawed decision that cost us the player.

Sanchez's camp didn't want to wait till summer, we didn't mind. As long as we didn't pay Arsenal over £20m because we were annoyed they didn't complete in summer.

 

[jay laruja]

Arsenal, Rags, and his agent all benefit if Alexis Signs for the rags in this window. If his agent doesn't convince him to ditch Pep to play for the rags, he''ll be a city player come summer.

 

[lee_wsm]

We should have paid the money but it's done now let's hope the team can find a good option b that may be younger and therefore play for longer

 

[Bill]

Surely there is time for a Re-hijack to shoot them down at the last minute ?? I just can't see Pep allowing this, strengthening them..

Something has clearly changed here.
Manchester city don't miss out on a player for the sake of 10 /20 million quid.we set an unrealistic limit knowing it would get knocked back by all concerned.Pep and city have played a blinder here. They have smelt trouble and walked away.had they just pulled the plug people would been alerted to why would we do that. Now this way United have lumped on paying 100 m for what looks like a mard arse controlled by his agent. At our figures we could have hoofed him and not made a loss.

Proud of my club.