Alexis Sanchez

[schfc6]

Who's Mickey?

The Armenian lad who's career they are destroying.

 

[Phil1]

Not defending that user's opinion, but you've to be pretty dumb to think that the capitalization of letters is random. It's called camelCase - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camel_case.

I am pretty dumb tbf.

 

[OhSoGroovy]

[

The ranDom capitoL letterRs in the uSername are hurtInG my HeaD.

Are you going to make a worthwhile retort to my argument at some point or what?

 

[OhSoGroovy]

Your user name is shite as are most of your comments! How did you think city fans would react on its biggest forum when people who don't support the club come on claiming Liverpool have a better attack etc?

Yes, that was a bad move on my part, haha. But I never claimed they had a better attack, the point was leaning more towards those clubs signing/having proven & clinical goalscorers on the wings. With Sánchez being a clear improvement in the finishing department over the likes of Sterling & Sané. Honestly still think some people in general elsewhere underestimate how big of a game changer Sánchez is. It'll proper City to having an attack rivaling (perhaps even on par, potentially) the likes of Barca, Real & Bayern

I did choose a weird way of clarifying that point though, yes

 

[sky_blue]

I am pretty dumb tbf.

Fair enough. Each day we all learn something new. CamelCase is a pretty popular typographical convention for joining words when you don't want/can't have spaces like variables in a programming language or hashtags in a tweet. That along with underscores are the two most popular conventions.

 

[Blue Llama]

I think his main argument is that Sanchez would help us score more goals & you would have to agree.

He's just chosen a really bizarre & somewhat fanciful way to make a case for it.

You'r definitely right he should have thrown the spade away after making the point that Sanchez would improve City. The mistake was trying to suggest that united and liverpool had better options.

 

[Phil1]

[ Are you going to make a worthwhile retort to my argument at some point or what?

When I read something of substance and not just lots of words on a screen then yes, you will get a worthwhile retort. As it stands I've seen nothing in your arguments that make sense apart from the obvious - Sanchez would be a great signing. Nobody disagrees with that. Your reasoning when comparing ourselves with Liverpool or utd is getting all the derision it deserves.

 

[The Doctor]

Who's Mickey?

And where's Jesse?

 

[Phil1]

Fair enough. Each day we all learn something new. CamelCase is a pretty popular typographical convention for joining words when you don't want/can't have spaces like variables in a programming language or hashtags in a tweet. That along with underscores are the two most popular conventions.

Still looks daft as a username. :-)

 

[GX Blue]

Yes, that was a bad move on my part, haha. But I never claimed they had a better attack, the point was leaning more towards those clubs signing/having proven & clinical goalscorers on the wings. With Sánchez being a clear improvement in the finishing department over the likes of Sterling & Sané.

I did choose a weird way of clarifying that point though, yes

I’ve understood from the start what you are trying to say. You’ve just had trouble putting it in the correct way.
As for your username, what the fuk has it got to do with anyone else what you call yourself.