Alexis Sanchez

[blueinsa]

A hazardesque mistake this by City.

Its not a mistake if those numbers being quoted are correct.

 

[johnmc]

Honestly not really bothered if he goes there. i did want him at the start, but the longer this has gone on the less I want it to happen. The money involved is just crazy for a 29/30 year old.

What’s a 29/30 year old?

 

[waspish]

A hazardesque mistake this by City.

Hazard was a lot younger and we should payed up but ffp was a problem.

 

[Bluesince1979]

Paint the league table on his sitting room wall.

Ive pointed out that things aint too bad at the mo

 

[Akiva]

A hazardesque mistake this by City.

400k/week? Nah. He's not worth blowing up our wage structure for.

We're 15 points clear and sailing. The rags are light years behind even if they do get Sanchez.

 

[manimanc]

A hazardesque mistake this by City.

Is it fuck. Have you seen the table? The squad?
Most ridiculous post I've seen on here and there has been some proper shit one's.

 

[taleofbluehalves]

A hazardesque mistake this by City.

He’s 29. Hazard was 21? So short term by Utd for those numbers. Short term manager short term club.

 

[goalmole]

My dad is on the verge of ending it all if he goes to ‘them’.

So where are you hoping he goes then?

 

[razman]

A hazardesque mistake this by City.

Yes he would help us in the champions league.... But hazard was younger and we needed him a lot more at that time ... As our squad was nowhere as good

 

[machine9]

Peg was moaning about not spending enuff money the other week,well seems they listened

 

[cookster]

A hazardesque mistake this by City.

How so? Hazard 22, Sanchez 30 next!

 

[manimanc]

Man Utd right now..

 

[sky_blue]

Guardian are explicitly reporting that Sanchez has made up his mind finally -

Alexis Sánchez will not play for Arsenal at Bournemouth on Sunday – the forward has not travelled to the south coast – and the latest indication is that he has come to favour a move to Manchester United over Manchester City. City almost got Sánchez for £60m last summer and they have indicated a willingness to pay £20m for him this month. But United have moved ahead of their cross-town rivals with a more lucrative package and the sense at Arsenal is that Sánchez has had his head turned by it.

 

[mixer]

If the figures are accurate then it's hard to see him pick us even with pep 400 grand a week is crazy sums for a 29 year old with 6 month's left on his contract Sanchez or not.

 

[@BluePhil8]

400k a week is £1.6m a month.

 

[Esteban de la Sexface]

When we are 3-0 up in April, if Sanchez goes there, I hope the South Stand make him fully aware of his bad decision.

 

[Woody135]

Would have loved to have had a player of his ability come to City because he wanted to, but if that isn't going to happen, I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. Maybe we forgot this was football after all and money runs an awful lot of it.
There are holes too big in the United team and club as a whole for him to fill. In fact paying him 400k(!) per week will probably do more damage than good in the long run

 

[Bluesince1979]

So where are you hoping he goes then?

I think we need a striker. If its him, fine, if its not, no problem. As long as there is a plan B.

I literally trust that our bosses will do the right thing. I dont question anything they do anymore

 

[SWP's back]

What’s a 29/30 year old?

Slightly older than a 28/29 year old.

 

[Lancet Fluke]

If Cross is saying utd then you cant dismiss it.

He may well be on his way to united but it is always worth bearing in mind that there is often an ulterior motive to things Cross says. What he says comes from Arsenal not Sanchez's people. If united have offered Arsenal more as a transfer fee then it is in Arsenal's interest to try to force our hand by pushing this line that he is on the verge of going to them. And if it is ever in Arsenal's interest to report something in a certain way, even if it is not true, then you can bet your life that this **** will have no issue putting it in a national paper.