A shit load of cash but given none of them will be 30 this year and are not showing any hint of decline which would be the better deal?
I really hope that mikataryan refuses to go to arsenal on the 31 jan this leaves no time for anyother club to come in for sancheswhich would scupper his move to utd. Let him be forced to stay at arsenal the money grabbing twat
Or just stay at the swamp and fuck Mourinho off no end!I’ve seen an article in football365 that someone at the rags is claiming Micky Terrapin will be seen as a hate figure if he stays and scuppers this transfer. It’s almost like constructive dismissal, I hope he goes elsewhere finds his Dortmund form and puts a worldy performance in against the rags at some point.
'Confessed' is about right.
Yet you manage to log in again to tell us?
Bless and say hi to all of your mates won’t you lol.
stay strong mikiwhatsit,scupper the whole dealOr just stay at the swamp and fuck Mourinho off no end!
Or just stay at the swamp and fuck Mourinho off no end!
So you'd pay Sanchez what he wanted is that what your trying to sayTalking riddles. If we were to buy Hazard or Salah for example, first of all it’s unlikely Liverpool or Chelsea would sell to us. If they did you are talking £150m+ transfer fee. And then £300k a week. Plus all the agent fees that Sanchez had. They aren’t specific to him. Sanchez is half the price. And thats fair enough as he has no sell on but don’t go on that Salah and Hazard are viable alternatives because believe me they are not.
I really hope that mikataryan refuses to go to arsenal on the 31 jan this leaves no time for anyother club to come in for sancheswhich would scupper his move to utd. Let him be forced to stay at arsenal the money grabbing twat
I will preying they look utterley hopeless thenUnited will just pay £35 million straight long before 31 Jan if he wont go.
Or whatever it takes. They have to push this through now or they look utterly hopeless.
Sanchez will not stay. He wants out.
Ha. We bought Jesus for £27m a year ago. Not relevant.
If we wanted to buy Salah now, do you think they would say oh £90m is a good return on our investment. Not a chance. What they paid is irrelevant. They wouldn’t take £180m for him.
How is Sanchez half the price of a £150M transfer on £300k/week? It's about £6M/year more (assuming a 5 year deal).Talking riddles. If we were to buy Hazard or Salah for example, first of all it’s unlikely Liverpool or Chelsea would sell to us. If they did you are talking £150m+ transfer fee. And then £300k a week. Plus all the agent fees that Sanchez had. They aren’t specific to him. Sanchez is half the price. And thats fair enough as he has no sell on but don’t go on that Salah and Hazard are viable alternatives because believe me they are not.
I can see the Rags spending this now only for Maureen to demand spending twice this amount on Ladyboy in a matter of months
Also 6 months left on the contract, 29 years old and motioning for a move out of their current club, all needs to be taken into account. He's talented for sure but when valuing a player, lots of factors come into play.
So you'd pay Sanchez what he wanted is that what your trying to say