All Time Top 1100 Albums (Aerosmith - Big Ones) P265

I'll give it 6. Love the Beatles, but this is nowhere near their finest album. Three or four great songs on it but if anyone asks me to play the Beatles, this is not what I would put on.
 
Far from my favourite Beatles album, but when all’s said and done it’s still got ‘Help’, ‘You’ve got to hide your love away’, ‘Ticket to ride‘ and ‘Yesterday’ on it, plus ‘The night before’, ‘You’re gonna lose that girl’ and ‘I’ve just seen a face’ are the kind of standard Beatles album tracks that other bands would have sold their grannies for. And even ‘I need you’, ‘It’s only love‘ and ‘Tell me what you see’ are catchy if nothing else.
The only two screaming duffers on there for me are ‘Act Naturally’ (why they wasted a track on virtually every album just to let Ringo have a sing I’ll never know, cos apart from ‘Boys’ on Please please me and ‘With a little help from my friends’ on Pepper, his vocal leads were always the worst contributions) and that really tinny version of ‘Dizzy Miss Lizzy’ (by contrast the live version on Beatles at the Hollywood Bowl kicks arse).
All told I’d probably give it a 7/10, which, as others have said, is still pretty impressive given that they were churning out somewhere between 30 and 40 new songs a year at that point, but it feels like a bit of a throw away album compared to Rubber Soul, Revolver, Abbey Road and even A Hard Day’s Night
 
Last edited:
When I saw this week's album, I thought that track would be one of the "standard Beatles tracks" but the vocals were so much better than I remembered, much more powerful.
Slight confession on my behalf.

I was listening to it whilst driving back from work and noticed how clean, balanced and sharp it sounded - it was the 2009 remastered version.

It is what it is..............
 
Far from my favourite Beatles album, but when all’s said and done it’s still got ‘Help’, ‘You’ve got to hide your love away’, ‘Ticket to ride‘ and ‘Yesterday’ on it, plus ‘The night before’, ‘You’re gonna lose that girl’ and ‘I’ve just seen a face’ are the kind of standard Beatles album tracks that other bands would have sold their grannies for. And even ‘I need you’, ‘It’s only love‘ and ‘Tell me what you see’ are catchy if nothing else.
The only two screaming duffers on there for me are ‘Act Naturally’ (why they wasted a track on virtually every album just to let Ringo have a sing I’ll never know, cos apart from ‘Boys’ on Please please me and ‘With a little help from my friends’ on Pepper, his vocal leads were always the worst contributions) and that really tinny version of ‘Dizzy Miss Lizzy’ (by contrast the live version on Beatles at the Hollywood Bowl kicks arse).
All told I’d probably give it a 7/10, which, as others have said, is still pretty impressive given that they were churning out somewhere between 30 and 40 new songs a year at that point
Sheer fucking madness isn't it...........
 
A few classics on there, good album but not their best. 6.5/10

How does everyone else rank their albums?

For me it'd probably be:

1. Revolver
2. Abbey Road
3. Rubber Soul
4. The White Album
5. Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
6. Magical Mystery Tour
7. Let It Be
8. Help!
9. A Hard Day's Night
10. Please Please Me

6 or 7 /10 ?
 
Sheer fucking madness isn't it...........

Yeh, ridiculous, even if it is a bit of a cheat code having Lennon and McCartney in the same band. I think the final total in 1965 was actually 33.
28 on Help and Rubber Soul, plus We Can Work It Out, Day Tripper, Yes It Is, I’m Down and Bad Boy.
It’s the fact that so many of the 33 are of such high quality as well, which is so amazing
 
Completely agree.
I read a description of the Revolver album.
40 minutes, 14 songs, non like any other and yet you knew it was them.
In other words, a masterpiece.

I go frequently on another forum about music generally.
There are some very serious music fans who spend thousands on equipment LoL..
Anyway their are tons of Beatles threads, far outweighing other artists.
Amazing, considering they split up 51 years ago
I think the fact that Rubenstein , Bernstein and Sinatra were all devotees says it all.

Lennon and McCartney just the cream of the crop when it comes to musical penmanship.

Harrison wasn't too bad either and George Martin a maestro.

imagine a catalogue of Rubber Soul , Revolver , Sgt Peppers , the White Album , Abbey Road and Let it Be for starters.

Most of the great Aussie Musicians of the 60's , 70's , 80's and 90's before music ceased being music on mainstream universally state them as their greatest inspiration and motivation to write music that could be considered in the same light knowing they couldn't but gave it a good shot.

the Beatles are the main reason some of my finest moments in life have been because of the wonders of music.

Anybody who has had the opportunity of listening to their masterpieces can die happy.
 
Last edited:
Your point about time span I think is valid, because I’ve overlistened to them over the years too, where I virtually never play their music anymore. But that doesn’t stop me acknowledging the power of their music. However, if your post reaches a point where you’re comparing The Beatles to, er, Tommy Dorsey, then all hope is lost.
Anyway, good call re the Foos - think I’ll go and listen to some Learning To Fly ;-)

I’m kind of the opposite in as much as I’ve definitely over-listened to them as well, but continue to do so some 45 years after I first heard them. I listen to tons of other stuff from a variety of different genres too, but they’re still my ‘go to’ band, to the degree that I can play 70 odd of their songs on the guitar, whereas the next nearest band would probably be about 4 or 5.
If I ever had to give up one of City or the Beatles it would be a tough call!
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.