Mancityfans.net'er
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 444
As in he may have just pissed the club offWe must have allowed it, and sounds like we don’t want him to go so hardly burned any bridges. If anything would have built one.
As in he may have just pissed the club offWe must have allowed it, and sounds like we don’t want him to go so hardly burned any bridges. If anything would have built one.
Obviously not, or they wouldn’t want him to stay, nor would they have let him go.As in he may have just pissed the club off
The club accepted his request. Madrid rejected Brahim Diaz’s.Alvarez included in the squad for the paris olympics. Baffling. I'd be so pissed if I was Guardiola. Man won't be available until mid september as he won't have had a break. Guess it's the only thing he hasn't won that you could possibly win in football. Hoping this doesn't mean he's trying to engineer a way out.
We all know when pep gets a bee in his bonnet with players so let's see. I'd rather not see alvarez playing wing anyway. He is a centre forward.Obviously not, or they wouldn’t want him to stay, nor would they have let him go.
In all honesty, can we tell a player who sits behind Haaland in the running order that he can't choose to represent his country in the Olympics?He may have just burned his bridges choosing to play in the Olympics.
Not sure why any footballer, golfer or tennis player would be remotely interested in the Olympics. These sports have their respective Everests. Leave the Olympics to runners, jumpers, weight lifters, swimmers, skiers etcIn all honesty, can we tell a player who sits behind Haaland in the running order that he can't choose to represent his country in the Olympics?
Well, if we pay them weekly wages to be available for the team, then yes.In all honesty, can we tell a player who sits behind Haaland in the running order that he can't choose to represent his country in the Olympics?