Mr Rich said:
Well I wouldn't agree but yesterday's match showed something unexpected, City performed the worst we've seen for ages and everyone admitted it, but we only lost 3-2.
If we'd have won it would have been, dare I say it, 'United esc.' What it proved is that one of United's best performances only yielded a few good chances. Considering it is conceivable that City would have defended better if the game actually mattered, Joe Hart didn't actually really make a save, their goalie was pretty awful....all bodes well for a good season.
United DID NOT have give one of their 'best performances'. Rooney was quiet, De Gea conceded a shit goal, second choice centre backs for second half, Danny Wellbeck, 4th choice striker, started up front.
Everyone is in dreamland if they think that's the best the rags have to offer, they are well capable of stepping it up a gear.