Anelka - 15m from Bolton to Chelsea - Bargain or what?

[mr t]

I can't get it out of my head.

Only 12 months ago Chelsea paid 15m for Anelka.

I thaought it was a bargain at the time but when you look at some of the deals being done now it's looking like the steal of the decade.

Am I right?

 

[Manchester Bleu]

If he stays there long enough - possibly!

His problem is he just isn`t consistent, he`ll probably get fed up and move on for another big fee.

As uncle arry would say "triffic player".

 

[mcfc78]

who cares??????????????/

 

[mr t]

who cares??????????????/

I liked him at City - I'd have him back for 15m.

I know he's getting a bit long in the tooth but he's the finished article - he's still baggin goals for Chelsea and he'll get a few more before the seasons out.

 

[the_invisible_man]

we're the only club who have lost money on him, typical!

 

[blue62]

Totally over-rated, the cause of many of Chelsea's problems. Has no-one noticed how the goals have dried up? He is not a patch on Drogba, and won't even be at Chelsea in 12 months time. Not a top-drawer player, and never been a team player, despite his own very high opinion of himself.

 

[spartaks]

we should offer 35m for him right now IMO.

 

[Natt]

who cares??????????????/

I do care

 

[Natt]

I think the price is too expensive. He's a good player but at this age, he's quite old, the maximum price should be around 8-12mil.

 

[bobrivers]

I think the price is too expensive. He's a good player but at this age, he's quite old, the maximum price should be around 8-12mil.

Bellamy is the same age and cost only 1m less.