anyone know how bad ass these shieks are?

how does anyone know if this guy is ITK.

hes recentley joined and made a topic about managers coming in and players coming in and people are taking on what he says as he is a defo ITK'er.

no one knows this guy from adam but because of his username he has to be telling te truth.

can someone who has stuck up for this lad please tell us who are thinking hes talking bollocks one reason why we should all think he knows whats going on behind the scene at our club?
 
Nipped out for meal with friends and all hell has broken loose. When i went out i was just thanking Ajay for advising me the best time to take off work to catch all the news and now it seems having read all the thread that there has bit a bit of a rumpus about if we should believe ITKs like Ajay and ZZ. Well for what it is worth this is my view . I find their posts entertaining and something to think about , discuss and get excited about. I don't take it as fact I take it as they know of discussions and options which are being discussed .we all should know that with millions of pounds at stake and lots of variables even at the last minute things can change. I don't know Ajay or ZZ personally i have no idea who they are or what they do , but they seem to post things they have heard or been party to in an honest way for us to deliberate over. I don't get why they have to tolerate people attacking them personally. If you don't believe them fine fair enough and everyone is entitled to a view but even if things don't come off it is no indicator that the info when posted was wrong or meant to mislead etc. Keep posting Ajay and ZZ please.. I was hooked in the last window and i am sure more and more stuff will emerge over the coming weeks. I don't expect you to be the delphic oracle but you add entertainment and info and discussion when the club are telling us nowt. Love it !!
sorry for the long post but had to get that off me chest
 
pardoe said:
Ajay said:
And so it starts again!

People post on here and get no shit - I post something that is not in anyway controversial and I get the shit!

And you wonder why I can't be arsed!!!!!!

No need for that, mate. I'm sure you're a nice guy, and a blue, but 99% of your 'ITK info' turned out to be complete rubbish.

Lol, 99%????????????????????????
 
I tend to be a lurker on here rather than a regular poster, but it seemed to me that ZZ was getting a degree of credence because he seemed to be being endorsed by sensible people like OB1, who know both this board and the MEN boards. These posters seemed to think that it was both the same poster from the MEN site and that the poster does have some kind of track record.

I find the postings of ITKs interesting and fun, but you always have to take them with a pinch of salt. Even if the poster has a degree of inside knowledge, maybe they're talking themselves up to seem slightly better connected than they really are - people exaggerate all the time in life to make themselves sound more impressive. And even if the ITK poster isn't doing that, who's to say that their source isn't. And then there's the fact that, while the source may get to hear bits of information, the whole picture is usually available to a very small number of very highly placed individuals, and, if they're professional, it simply doesn't leak.

Plus you always have to bear in mind that, in any field but especially the volatile world of football, a deal is never done until it's done. You may have a player lined up, but until the ink dries on the contract, the selling club can change its mind or he can change his mind, or either of them can ask for more money, or someone else can suddenly come in for him at the last minute. There are so many things that can go wrong.

So with posters who are ITK, you judge them on their record. But even the postings of the ones who clearly have some kind of 'in' with someone at or connected with the club can't be taken as gospel. Just look on it as an entertaining look at something which may or may not come to pass.
 
This is clearly BS... if he graduated in 2003 he would need to do the LPC course which he would have finished in 2004. It takes 2 years as a trainee to qualify as a solicitor so he would have qualified in 2006 not 2005.

(cambridgerag)

Now im not one to get upset at the insinuations aimed by others, on the contrary,I find it highly amusing, however jockstraps like this I really can't fathom...... why would you try to discredit someone on a subject you clearly know very little or nothing about? Your probably a solicitor which would make it all the more negligible, Donahue and his mate Stephenson will be turning in the proverbial graves. Do tell the audience master yoda on the benefits of specialist PSC when one is working in local government, I'm intrigued. And the advantages, of the timing variety that it is, to taking the HRAT instead of other PSC electives........ the SRA's regulations state what my good fellow?

The problem here cambridge is you have been taken in by negativity aimed by half heads who, when not privy to info, throw gi joe out the pram. Don't confuse the way I post as a marker for my intelligence, you'd be grossly mistaken

Now in my broadest m14 accent................ DO1.
 
I do enjoy a good "ITK" thread, not for the snippets of what's to come at MCFC but to see the frothing, rabid replies.
I'd love to know what volume and what type of PM's the likes of ZZ and Ajay, surely, must be inundated with. Offers of sweets to know when the new kit is out, or the promise of a ride on someones Grifter if you spill the beans on the next big target.
Are there any sychophantic snivvling PM's winging their way to ZZ as we speak?
 
zin mate any more news for those like me who are intrested in what you say without having to try and put a decent discussion down
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.