You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Are PSG richer than us?
- Thread starter Jumanji
- Start date
citytill1die84
Well-Known Member
No
citytill1die84 said:
Le Havre Oswald
Well-Known Member
i hope not because if they are im going to have to change teams AGAIN.
eddiemarin09
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Mar 2012
- Messages
- 981
Lmaoooooooo u know how many band wagoners thought the same thing..not saying u r but makes for great comedy!....but idk if there richer than us but I think there are we were a few years ago buying big names left and right..but now were at the phase where we got talent now were just being smarter with our money..sheik is a smart and patient manmcfc2607 said:i hope not because if they are im going to have to change teams AGAIN.
SOMEONE GET A MOD IN HERE!eddiemarin09 said:Lmaoooooooo u know how many band wagoners thought the same thing..not saying u r but makes for great comedy!....but idk if there richer than us but I think there are we were a few years ago buying big names left and right..but now were at the phase where we got talent now were just being smarter with our money..sheik is a smart and patient manmcfc2607 said:i hope not because if they are im going to have to change teams AGAIN.
Upadated code of conduct rule eleven
'Please avoid using "txt spk" as it has a habit of pissing people off'
11.
Should of bean a Mod in hear buy know.BlueTG said:SOMEONE GET A MOD IN HERE!eddiemarin09 said:Lmaoooooooo u know how many band wagoners thought the same thing..not saying u r but makes for great comedy!....but idk if there richer than us but I think there are we were a few years ago buying big names left and right..but now were at the phase where we got talent now were just being smarter with our money..sheik is a smart and patient manmcfc2607 said:i hope not because if they are im going to have to change teams AGAIN.
Upadated code of conduct rule eleven
'Please avoid using "txt spk" as it has a habit of pissing people off'
11.
cringe...
Bill
Well-Known Member
no, but they dont have to worry about ffp cos they are french.
Matty
Well-Known Member
The aim of FFP is to make it irrelevant how wealthy our owners, or their owners, actually are. You can be owned by the wealthiest man on the planet, or by a skinflint Scrroge type, and it has no impact on your spending in terms of player purchases and wages. You can only spend what you make (or at least that will be the ultimate "goal" of these rules). FFP has been introduced to prevent the establishment being challenged by anyone else. If it had been introduced 10 years ago we'd have been royally fucked, and ADUG wouldn't have purchased us. Thankfully, from City's perspective, the stable door is only now being closed, and our horse has bolted, and won the Grand National.
BoyBlue_1985
Well-Known Member
No they are still allowed to put in £35 mill a yearMatty said:The aim of FFP is to make it irrelevant how wealthy our owners, or their owners, actually are. You can be owned by the wealthiest man on the planet, or by a skinflint Scrroge type, and it has no impact on your spending in terms of player purchases and wages. You can only spend what you make (or at least that will be the ultimate "goal" of these rules). FFP has been introduced to prevent the establishment being challenged by anyone else. If it had been introduced 10 years ago we'd have been royally fucked, and ADUG wouldn't have purchased us. Thankfully, from City's perspective, the stable door is only now being closed, and our horse has bolted, and won the Grand National.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,478
No they aren't.BoyBlue_1985 said:No they are still allowed to put in £35 mill a yearMatty said:The aim of FFP is to make it irrelevant how wealthy our owners, or their owners, actually are. You can be owned by the wealthiest man on the planet, or by a skinflint Scrroge type, and it has no impact on your spending in terms of player purchases and wages. You can only spend what you make (or at least that will be the ultimate "goal" of these rules). FFP has been introduced to prevent the establishment being challenged by anyone else. If it had been introduced 10 years ago we'd have been royally fucked, and ADUG wouldn't have purchased us. Thankfully, from City's perspective, the stable door is only now being closed, and our horse has bolted, and won the Grand National.
BoyBlue_1985
Well-Known Member
Thats what I read in the early stagesSWP's back said:No they aren't.BoyBlue_1985 said:No they are still allowed to put in £35 mill a yearMatty said:The aim of FFP is to make it irrelevant how wealthy our owners, or their owners, actually are. You can be owned by the wealthiest man on the planet, or by a skinflint Scrroge type, and it has no impact on your spending in terms of player purchases and wages. You can only spend what you make (or at least that will be the ultimate "goal" of these rules). FFP has been introduced to prevent the establishment being challenged by anyone else. If it had been introduced 10 years ago we'd have been royally fucked, and ADUG wouldn't have purchased us. Thankfully, from City's perspective, the stable door is only now being closed, and our horse has bolted, and won the Grand National.
It is ofcourse all irrelevant as in my mind, the richest clubs in the world are Madrid and Barca. However, to answer your question, in terms of resources directly behind the club probably about the same (although it is almost impossible to measure), but in terms of spending power yes. The advantage that PSG have is that they did not have an interim stage in their development, they have bought very well from the start.