Are we actually paying £107m?

[Bongo Joe]

Are we actually paying £107m?

I think that is a lot! :| Surely it's about £70m for Kaka, £20m for Agent, £7m signing on and then his wages on top? No matter how much money we have, this falls into the cattegory of spending over the odds for players.

 

[danbanjovi]

Re: Are we actually paying £107m?

Who cares?

 

[svennis pennis]

Re: Are we actually paying £107m?

No its 107 million and 35 million in agents fees. A bargain in my eyes.

 

[Dobsy87]

Re: Are we actually paying £107m?

Apparently £107 million plus £35 million on top for agents etc.

 

[Luke The Blue]

Re: Are we actually paying £107m?

I think that is a lot! :| Surely it's about £70m for Kaka, £20m for Agent, £7m signing on and then his wages on top? No matter how much money we have, this falls into the cattegory of spending over the odds for players.

Why you being so negative this kaka were talking about!!!!!!

would u rather city have kaka yes or no?

 

[foreverblue]

Re: Are we actually paying £107m?

I think that is a lot! :| Surely it's about £70m for Kaka, £20m for Agent, £7m signing on and then his wages on top? No matter how much money we have, this falls into the cattegory of spending over the odds for players.

What do you think we are? Cheapskates!

 

[brady0]

Re: Are we actually paying £107m?

i dont think we are tbh but we'l have to wait and see.

 

[Bongo Joe]

Re: Are we actually paying £107m?

No its 107 million and 35 million in agents fees. A bargain in my eyes.

Are you Sheikh Mansour?!

 

[alib]

Re: Are we actually paying £107m?

what's £30/£40 m amongst fiends?

 

[rastus]

Re: Are we actually paying £107m?

If RSC is valued at 25mil, Kaka a steal at £100