Can’t understand why there’s any discussion whatsoever in any of the media, or on any forum, about VAR not calling the ref over. For the first penalty shout, the ref wasn’t prepared to give it, VAR checked it, and agreed. In the second penalty shout, the ref wasn’t prepared to give it, VAR checked it, disagreed, and called the ref over to give the ref the chance to change his mind. That’s the rule, like it or not. Can’t understand how paid pundits aren’t able to grasp this. Can’t understand how ordinary fans can’t understand it, to be honest. Both calls were correct, incidentally. The Arsenal player actually steps on Ed’s ankle. Ed gets plenty of the ball. Ed’s such a weirdo that he doesn’t make anything of it. Must have hurt, though. Bernie doesn’t ‘dive’ – he is well and truly blocked by the defender’s thigh, which he goes crashing into. For good measure, his shirt is good and thoroughly held. Penalty on either count. I don’t defend every penalty given to City, I call it as I see it (and sometimes get shit for it). Nothing controversial here. Arsenal were clearly better on the day, and it’s hard lines, but that’s neither here nor there.
I’m just basking thinking of the frothing Liverpool supporters tonight…
Just a side comment about the BT commentary. I didn’t hear it (and will never hear it, because I don’t watch us on BT). I’ve got no axe to grind either way. But it’s striking that fans of clubs that are either neutral or fairly hostile to us are commenting on their forums about how blatantly pro-Arsenal and anti-City it was. I had to put up with the French commentary, which was so unashamedly pro-Arsenal that I’d had enough and turned it down completely after ten minutes, substituting Greater Manchester radio for it.
The happiest of New Years to all of you blues. Savour it.