I reckon Arsenal will go hard at City from kick off just like Arsenal did at the Dippers in order to try and get the 1st goal and then try and catch City on the break as City push forward.
That sounds like a reasonable strategy but it has its trade-offs.
If you go hard at City you leave spaces that can be exploited. It's risky, as KDB and Haaland are the best pair in football when it comes to make use of such spaces, especially at the Etihad.
Unlike Liverpool, who for some reason are slow starters and need more time to find rhythm, City are generally not like that. We could have been 2 goals up at Anfield in the first 10 minutes a week ago.
Yes, Spurs and Chelsea scored first at the Etihad, but Haaland missed big chances in both games. We could have won both games quite comfortably.
City haven't been great so far, but that's partly (or mostly) due to the fact that, IMO, the team has been prepared to peak in the final 8 weeks. Nobody knows whether it will happen, but people (including many City fans) saying City are worse than last season might be wrong, as the most important part of the season is yet to start and we have more wins in all compets than last season. The way we moved the ball vs Newcastle was encouraging.