cleavers
Moderator
He should have used miracle grow.Which is a joke considering he cost 50m.......
He should have used miracle grow.Which is a joke considering he cost 50m.......
I agree, though I think Sterling was about an inch too short.
It's interesting that quite a lot of 'experts' seem confused as to why some Arsenal players were out on their feet in the last half an hour. Chasing the ball for most of the game might be an answer they've not thought of yet...Had most of the possession in their half, yes a lot of it was side to side, but we still had it.
It's interesting that quite a lot of 'experts' seem confused as to why some Arsenal players were out on their feet in the last half an hour. Chasing the ball for most of the game might be an answer they've not thought of yet...
We had the ball in the first half but didn't seem to be going anywhere and they looked a threat on the break. Second half we played the game in their half and they did't have a shot
PS If anyone in the crowd again shouts 'get rid' or 'kick it long' - watch or first goal
It's interesting that quite a lot of 'experts' seem confused as to why some Arsenal players were out on their feet in the last half an hour. Chasing the ball for most of the game might be an answer they've not thought of yet...
Running further with the ball is infinitely less tiring than chasing it around the pitch.Perhaps because City ran further.
Its interesting that, I don't normally look for these sort of stats, as I don't always think they tell a better story than my own eyes/brain.Perhaps because City ran further.
Did they really ? A misplaced Walcott header and a Bellerin shot over the bar apart from the goal, hardly backs to the wall stuff was it.What did we do 1st half? Toure had a header from a corner, and Sterling had a diving header that went just wide. All City's pressure and significant efforts on goal came in the 2nd half. We were poor 1st half, or they were good. Whichever way you look at it, they had the edge in the 1st half.