Atmosphere Thread | 2025/26

Yes but coming on here moaning because your pint wasn't full ? Fucking hell, its not like they wouldn't have topped it up is it ?
I have tried to be nice but you are coming across like a dickhead and a thick bastard in a lot of your posts.

The staff should get it right first time but we can't criticise service in your eyes.
 
I wish they would fuck off to be honest mate, how would they cope if we were really shit ?
They wouldn’t cope. It’s a myth that the atmosphere was always great at Maine Road. It was great for big games. The atmosphere was shit at most clubs during the 80s and 90s apart from the big games. The funniest comments are from non match goers who say the crowd sounded quiet on the TV.
 
They wouldn’t cope. It’s a myth that the atmosphere was always great at Maine Road. It was great for big games. The atmosphere was shit at most clubs during the 80s and 90s apart from the big games. The funniest comments are from non match goers who say the crowd sounded quiet on the TV.
It beggars belief...
 
What did I say that wasn't factually correct?

I don't blame 1894 for everything, in fact the only thing I've ever criticised them for is the way they've handled this new north stand.

I've stood by you in protests, helped you out with displays and donated to you financially. I think the majority of the work you do is good work and wish for it to continue.

However I'm very passionate about this new stand, and firmly believe that the way that 1894 have publicly denounced it has contributed to the new stand not living up to its full potential.

Let me get this right.

You think the way that 1894 have publicly denounced NSL2 has contributed to the new stand not living up to its full potential, even though the new stand is far from completion.

That’s the best one so far. I will give you that.

So, exactly when do the club come into this for you and others?

1. From the initial fan consultation years ago?
2. From the PA which showed everything about the new North stand years ago?
3. From the non existing engagement between the club and the fans over NSL2 since the initial and basic fan consultation, years ago?
4. Anything else?

What about the club? What exactly have the club done to sell NSL2 to the fans as an atmospheric home end, bar announcing 3000 rail seats, and what else? The answer to that question is absolutely nothing of note.

Here’s an idea. Why don’t you and others criticising 1894 on BM approach the club yourselves, try and engage with the club, and see how far you get with the club.
 
Last edited:
What did I say that wasn't factually correct?

I don't blame 1894 for everything, in fact the only thing I've ever criticised them for is the way they've handled this new north stand.

I've stood by you in protests, helped you out with displays and donated to you financially. I think the majority of the work you do is good work and wish for it to continue.

However I'm very passionate about this new stand, and firmly believe that the way that 1894 have publicly denounced it has contributed to the new stand not living up to its full potential.
Last time I looked, the new stand hadn’t even opened yet!
 
Let me get this right.

You think the way that 1894 have publicly denounced NSL2 has contributed to the new stand not living up to its full potential, even though the new stand is far from completion.

That’s the best one so far. I will give you that.

So, exactly when do the club come into this for you and others?

1. From the initial fan consultation years ago?
2. From the PA which showed everything about the new North stand years ago?
3. From the non existing engagement between the club and the fans over NSL2 since the initial and basic fan consultation, years ago?
4. Anything else?

What about the club? What exactly have the club done to sell NSL2 to the fans as an atmospheric home end, bar announcing 3000 rail seats, and what else? The answer to that question is absolutely nothing of note.

Here’s an idea. Why don’t you and others criticising 1894 on BM approach the club yourselves, try and engage with the club, and see how far you get with the club.
I’d actually argue that if it wasn’t for 1894’s input we’d be left with a stand that will be even less conducive to creating an atmosphere. In particular, there would be ZERO safe standing spaces, not 3000.

But yeah, let’s blame 1894 rather than the club. After all, the club wanted 7000 safe standing spaces in the new North Stand but those 1894 knobheads pushed back and told them to cap it at 3000!
 
Let me get this right.

You think the way that 1894 have publicly denounced NSL2 has contributed to the new stand not living up to its full potential.

That’s the best one so far. I will give you that.

So, exactly when do the club come into this for you and others?

1. From the initial fan consultation years ago?
2. From the PA which showed everything about the new North stand years ago?
3. From the non existing engagement between the club and the fans over NSL2 since the initial and basic fan consultation, years ago?
4. Anything else?

What about the club? What exactly have the club done to sell NSL2 to the fans as an atmospheric home end, bar announcing 3000 rail seats, and what else? The answer to that question is absolutely nothing of note.

Here’s an idea. Why don’t you and others criticising 1894 on BM, approach the club yourselves, try and engage with the club, and see how far you get with the club.
Nobody is claiming that 1894 is single-handedly causing NSL2 to underperform. The point is that public negativity from the group that has the biggest influence on the atmosphere in the stadium does have an impact, whether you want to acknowledge it or not. It isn’t the sole reason, but it’s part of the wider picture.

And yes, the club absolutely deserves criticism:

- The original consultation was vague and half-hearted.
- The presentations told us almost nothing practical.
- Communication since then has been non-existent.
- There’s been no real selling of the vision for a home end, no active engagement, no plan for how NSL2 will function on matchdays.

All of that is on the club, and nobody is excusing it.

But acknowledging that doesn’t mean 1894 are above scrutiny. They’re a prominent fan group whose statements do shape perceptions. When they publicly distance themselves from NSL2 before it’s even launched, that influences fans who might otherwise have given it a chance.

This isn’t “either blame the club or blame 1894.” There’s room for both conversations.

As for “go and speak to the club yourselves”, plenty of fans have tried. Many have emailed the club, spoken to Supporter Services, asked questions at meetings, and gotten nowhere. That’s exactly why people expected more constructive leadership from groups like 1894, even if the club has made it difficult.

It’s not a competition about who’s more at fault. It’s just recognising that:

The club failed to drive NSL2, and 1894’s public stance hasn’t helped either. Both things can be true.
 
Nobody is claiming that 1894 is single-handedly causing NSL2 to underperform. The point is that public negativity from the group that has the biggest influence on the atmosphere in the stadium does have an impact, whether you want to acknowledge it or not. It isn’t the sole reason, but it’s part of the wider picture.

And yes, the club absolutely deserves criticism:

- The original consultation was vague and half-hearted.
- The presentations told us almost nothing practical.
- Communication since then has been non-existent.
- There’s been no real selling of the vision for a home end, no active engagement, no plan for how NSL2 will function on matchdays.

All of that is on the club, and nobody is excusing it.

But acknowledging that doesn’t mean 1894 are above scrutiny. They’re a prominent fan group whose statements do shape perceptions. When they publicly distance themselves from NSL2 before it’s even launched, that influences fans who might otherwise have given it a chance.

This isn’t “either blame the club or blame 1894.” There’s room for both conversations.

As for “go and speak to the club yourselves”, plenty of fans have tried. Many have emailed the club, spoken to Supporter Services, asked questions at meetings, and gotten nowhere. That’s exactly why people expected more constructive leadership from groups like 1894, even if the club has made it difficult.

It’s not a competition about who’s more at fault. It’s just recognising that:

The club failed to drive NSL2, and 1894’s public stance hasn’t helped either. Both things can be true.
Mate, I love counting seats with you but 1894 have done as much as they possibly can and it’s now 14 months since we said our door is still open for the club to negotiate with us. Fact is that the ball has been in the club’s court since late September 2024. They’ve had the results of the 1894 members survey all that time, were urged to consult the existing ST holders in the North Stand about the plans (but didn’t), and despite the fact that 1894 don’t support the plans as they stand (based on the views of the overwhelming majority of our members and not because we’re just a bunch of arsey cunts) we’ve still offered to work with the club and help those vocal fans who want to relocate to the new stand.
 
I thought it improved massively when Leeds made a game of it. Maybe 3-2 is the future.

That's the problem sometimes, especially at home.

I thought the first half yesterday was probably one of easiest 45 mins of football we have played in a while. We barely got out of 1st gear. Also probably the reason why we couldn't get going in the second half.

When the game is too easy and looks to have no jeopardy, its very difficult as fans to chant to it.

You just end up watching an waiting for us to score the 3rd, 4th or even 5th goal in a formality.

Also, when 3 up against a big side you like rubbing it in. If your 3 up against a Wolves at home, it's sort of standard practice in a way.
 
Mate, I love counting seats with you but 1894 have done as much as they possibly can and it’s now 14 months since we said our door is still open for the club to negotiate with us. Fact is that the ball has been in the club’s court since late September 2024. They’ve had the results of the 1894 members survey all that time, were urged to consult the existing ST holders in the North Stand about the plans (but didn’t), and despite the fact that 1894 don’t support the plans as they stand (based on the views of the overwhelming majority of our members and not because we’re just a bunch of arsey cunts) we’ve still offered to work with the club and help those vocal fans who want to relocate to the new stand.
Of course mate, it's just debate and never personal as far as I'm concerned. We all want the same thing when all is said and done.

I hope you can understand why some fans feel frustrated by the way this has unfolded publicly. Not because 1894 have done nothing, you clearly have, but because once the club went quiet and dug their heels in, the whole thing basically turned into a standoff. And whether it’s fair or not, a visible group like 1894 inevitably shapes the tone of the conversation around NSL2.

In regards to the survey, were participants asked if "Despite the Clubs plans, would you still be interested in moving to the North Stand". I ask this because it seems to me that 1894 are interpreting 'Don't support the club's plans as they Stand' as 'Don't want to move to the stand'. Correct me if I'm wrong about this.

I truly believe that a successful North Stand would transform the atmosphere, and it frustrates me deeply that the opportunity is likely going to go to waste. 1894 have the reach to get people on board with it, regardless of the clubs plans. I hope we can make something work!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top