Because Pep is going to be our manager...not you.I'll probably get slaughtered for it but I'd rather break the bank for Hummels and Subotic. Our 4 cb's would be them and kompany and denayer.
We took a chance with otamendi and mangala. Why risk it with laporte?
So assuming we have a front 3 of Sterling, Kun and Sanchez with Kev at the top of a midfield triangle then who partners Gundongen at the base?
Bilbao don't sell. You have to meet the clause.Seems like we are paying well over the odds as per usual. I haven't seen much of him in action so I will reserve judgement.
If you stop thinking of them as defenders and rather as the beginning of our attack you will feel better.We really going to be signing two defenders worth 90 million combine? Really?
Um either you are making shit up or thats in Euros.only in the last 3 years - if this is true news - :
- mangala = 54 mIl
- ota = 45 mil
- laporte = 50 mil
- stones = 55 mil
= 204 mil on central defenders only in 3 years
shit sporring director ?!
Again, you've completely overlooked what we do with the 4th £30-40m CB. Kompany starts with one of the new ones, when Kompany gets injured the other new one comes in. So the 4th (presumably Otamendi) one does what exactly? The Demichelis role? Because no £30-40m player is going to do that role and it would be a complete and utter waste to have one there, that spot is tailor made for Denayer.
We used the Negredo money to stop him going across town. If we hadn't, I expect we would be solidly in 5th.Fine if it happens, it just puts an emphasis on what a stupid transfer it was. I'd love to know who's idea that was, because even at the time most people couldn't see any reason at all for it. I guess that's the problem with having a DoF, you never know whether signings are theirs or the managers. If we get rid of him after only one year without Pep even using him then it will look a lot like it was Pellegrini's idea