JOGAMIGMOG said:
JohnMaddocksAxe said:
Please compare the improvement that Gary Megson, Steve Bruce, Harry Redknapp, Sam Alladyce and Roy Hodgso have brought to their teams in less than a year with that brought by Hughes.
Then compare the quality of players that they are working with.
Then compare the financial support and money spent?
Then compare how much each has had to rly on inherited players that 'were not their own'.
Then compare the outward signs of disunity and poor morale in their squads?
Then compare how often they appear in the press hinting that their players are to blame for poor results and that their players are not up to the standards of the manager and his coaches because they are all 'winners'?
Then weigh up who has done the better job?
Then consider whether these teams are teams who should even be able to compare their ambitions to ours, let alone actually better them.
Not a bad effort. The thing is, we ARE improving both on and off the pitch. Those clubs you mention are small fry when compared to us and some have had disunity in their ranks - look at Zaki at Wigan for example. So what, they're all never going to be bigger or better than us.
At City, we have had a 30 year or more LOSING MENTALITY to try and shed. If it goes wrong it goes wrong at City. Cups for cock ups and all that. We have built our reputation on failure over the last 30 years. One of our best song is 'We never win at home and we never win away'.
The fucking LOSING MENTALITY is a tough one to shed. But trust me, in Hughes we are shedding it.
If you can't understand that or see why our club is different to any other then go and take a break for a couple of seasons and do some B&Q shopping at the weekend. When you come back, it will be a whole new Manchester City FC but one which you will still love and can maybe get behind.
The clubs I am comparing to them are, as you state, 'small fry'. And that is completely my point.
They are small fry but they can, under decent managers, achieve improvement with little in the way of resources. Improvement which sees them above or around us in the league. Improvement which dwarfs any improvement that Hughes can say he has achieved, despite the massive gap in quality of players they are working with.
The fact that they are 'small fry' also discounts the 'losing mentality excuse' that people point to as some sort of mythical entity holding us back. None of these clubs have a history of winning anything. All have comparable history to City over the past 30 years. Yet it doesn't stop their managers coming in and getting more out of poor players. And why should it?
It has no effect whatsoever on their immediate work, unsless they are some sort of superstitious nutter. So why is it a valid excuse for Hughes being unable to get anything like par performances out of a very talented squad? It's not like anyone, not one single person, has asked him to be challenging for anything this season. Just to show that he can take us forward.
And, I'm sorry, I can't understand how 'we are shedding the losing mentality' under Hughes. We have lost a huge amount of games this season, against all sorts and standard of opposition, and continue to do so. How does that tally with 'losing the losing mentality'?
What I do see is Hughes and his staff talking about that a lot and coming about with spin and soundbites about it.
Just like the likes of Mourinho, Moyes, Souness, Ball and others have done in the past. Unfortunately, you can split those managers into two groups. Those who jsut talk about it a lot and bang on about being 'winners' and those who have the ability to wed their spin and hard man bollocks to others skills like man management, making them a rounded manager and able to back up their talk.
At present, you can only say that Hughes is mirroring the Alan Ball/Souness option of talking hard and about being a winner but not actually showing any capacity to back it up.
Thanks for the inference that I should stop supporting my club because I don't believe in the manager though.