Ban For SWP

[svennis pennis]

The trannie did it two games on the trot. He did something similar to Dawson away at Spuds.

Unbelievable.

 

[sam the drummer]

In all fairness hes probably worth a run over vass surely? if it isnt working just sub him.....

 

[sam the drummer]

Oh and he can take freekicks too

 

[lancs blue]

As was pointed out on another topic we don't use orthodox wide players, SWP and Robinho are using the inside forward channels more than the wings. Elano for SWP is the obvious replacement with Weiss on the bench.

 

[AlfGreyruinedmyday]

let's just resign ourselves to losing him for 3 games, cause those gutl*ss bastards at the FA like Sky, just don't care who they upset outside the Top 4/5. Lampard red correctly overturned, Terry's red against us-incorrectly overturned, WBA lose to the rags 5-0 with 10 men, job done, overturn the red damage done. Now SWP will get a ban but Bosingwa will not face anything for studding someone in the back. God i miss being a carefree kid who didn't believe in conspiracy theories and that all people/clubs are treated the same.

On the other hand, i think the rest will do him good.

Every cloud

Presumably precedence has been set by the Ronaldo swipe when they played Stoke. Wilkinson was sent off and Ronaldo was seen to kick out. If I recall correctly, nothing was done then either at the time or retrospectively so I assume any good lawyer would take the FA to task. The more this ridiculous hiding behind "The officials saw it and did not deem it warranted any action" is done away with the better. If I walked down the street and kicked someone in the back with studded boots, I'd either get punched, arrested or accused of having strange taste in footwear. If that was not violent conduct then Pol Pot was a humanitarian. If the officials did not see it then they should be suspended. Also having a keen interest in both codes of rugby, I am constantly annoyed by football's inability to tackle any of the issues which detract from the enjoyment of this simple game. This is best illustrated by Morgan's on the Barnsley player.

 

[lancs blue]

let's just resign ourselves to losing him for 3 games, cause those gutl*ss bastards at the FA like Sky, just don't care who they upset outside the Top 4/5. Lampard red correctly overturned, Terry's red against us-incorrectly overturned, WBA lose to the rags 5-0 with 10 men, job done, overturn the red damage done. Now SWP will get a ban but Bosingwa will not face anything for studding someone in the back. God i miss being a carefree kid who didn't believe in conspiracy theories and that all people/clubs are treated the same.

On the other hand, i think the rest will do him good.

Every cloud

Presumably precedence has been set by the Ronaldo swipe when they played Stoke. Wilkinson was sent off and Ronaldo was seen to kick out. If I recall correctly, nothing was done then either at the time or retrospectively so I assume any good lawyer would take the FA to task. The more this ridiculous hiding behind "The officials saw it and did not deem it warranted any action" is done away with the better. If I walked down the street and kicked someone in the back with studded boots, I'd either get punched, arrested or accused of having strange taste in footwear. If that was not violent conduct then Pol Pot was a humanitarian. If the officials did not see it then they should be suspended. Also having a keen interest in both codes of rugby, I am constantly annoyed by football's inability to tackle any of the issues which detract from the enjoyment of this simple game. This is best illustrated by Morgan's on the Barnsley player.

They did do away with it on one occasion, oh hang on it was to punish a City player! (Thatcher on Mendes, yellow card upgraded to red and a further ban)

 

[JohnMaddocksAxe]

let's just resign ourselves to losing him for 3 games, cause those gutl*ss bastards at the FA like Sky, just don't care who they upset outside the Top 4/5. Lampard red correctly overturned, Terry's red against us-incorrectly overturned, WBA lose to the rags 5-0 with 10 men, job done, overturn the red damage done. Now SWP will get a ban but Bosingwa will not face anything for studding someone in the back. God i miss being a carefree kid who didn't believe in conspiracy theories and that all people/clubs are treated the same.

On the other hand, i think the rest will do him good.

Every cloud

Presumably precedence has been set by the Ronaldo swipe when they played Stoke. Wilkinson was sent off and Ronaldo was seen to kick out. If I recall correctly, nothing was done then either at the time or retrospectively so I assume any good lawyer would take the FA to task. The more this ridiculous hiding behind "The officials saw it and did not deem it warranted any action" is done away with the better. If I walked down the street and kicked someone in the back with studded boots, I'd either get punched, arrested or accused of having strange taste in footwear. If that was not violent conduct then Pol Pot was a humanitarian. If the officials did not see it then they should be suspended. Also having a keen interest in both codes of rugby, I am constantly annoyed by football's inability to tackle any of the issues which detract from the enjoyment of this simple game. This is best illustrated by Morgan's on the Barnsley player.

They did do away with it on one occasion, oh hang on it was to punish a City player! (Thatcher on Mendes, yellow card upgraded to red and a further ban)

Good. He deserved to have the book thrown at him. He should never have disgraced the City shirt again.

I'll admit the lack of consistentcy is a disgrace but I'm not going to defend someone like Thatcher for that assult.

 

[lancs blue]

let's just resign ourselves to losing him for 3 games, cause those gutl*ss bastards at the FA like Sky, just don't care who they upset outside the Top 4/5. Lampard red correctly overturned, Terry's red against us-incorrectly overturned, WBA lose to the rags 5-0 with 10 men, job done, overturn the red damage done. Now SWP will get a ban but Bosingwa will not face anything for studding someone in the back. God i miss being a carefree kid who didn't believe in conspiracy theories and that all people/clubs are treated the same.

On the other hand, i think the rest will do him good.

Every cloud

Presumably precedence has been set by the Ronaldo swipe when they played Stoke. Wilkinson was sent off and Ronaldo was seen to kick out. If I recall correctly, nothing was done then either at the time or retrospectively so I assume any good lawyer would take the FA to task. The more this ridiculous hiding behind "The officials saw it and did not deem it warranted any action" is done away with the better. If I walked down the street and kicked someone in the back with studded boots, I'd either get punched, arrested or accused of having strange taste in footwear. If that was not violent conduct then Pol Pot was a humanitarian. If the officials did not see it then they should be suspended. Also having a keen interest in both codes of rugby, I am constantly annoyed by football's inability to tackle any of the issues which detract from the enjoyment of this simple game. This is best illustrated by Morgan's on the Barnsley player.

They did do away with it on one occasion, oh hang on it was to punish a City player! (Thatcher on Mendes, yellow card upgraded to red and a further ban)

Good. He deserved to have the book thrown at him. He should never have disgraced the City shirt again.

I'll admit the lack of consistentcy is a disgrace but I'm not going to defend someone like Thatcher for that assult.

Where did I defend him?? I agree he deserved it - just pointing out that they can't start hiding behind rules that they've previously bent when it suited them.

 

[JohnMaddocksAxe]

No, I know you didn't. Just thought I'd have a dig at him as he was a disgrace to the club that day

 

[Dubai Blue]

Re: Sweep facing 3 match ban?

FIFA rules prevent the FA from re-refereeing games with the benefit of hindsight and video replays, but they are allowed to step in and act on any incident missed by the match officials.

The referee on Saturday was staring straight at SWP and Delap when it happened, and he was only a matter of yards away. There is absolutely no doubt that he saw it and decided not to take any action.

And if he did miraculously miss it, he should never referee another game ever again, since the incident happened right in front of his eyes. What exactly was he doing at this moment? Wondering what he was going to have for his tea?