Barcelona Vs AC Milan

malg said:
Just got back in from watching the game, and although Barcelona are a good team, they are also a bunch of cheating diving cunts. Some of the theatrics are verging on embarrassing. I saw them do it against Real Madrid, but I kind of understood it as Real were basically just kicking Barcelona off the ball. However, I don't think AC were that bad, but Barcelona just exaggerated every fucking tackle. Shite.

Did you see Iniesta's dive? Robinho's knee barley, and I mean barley, touches Inietsta's knee and then Iniesta goes down screaming and rolling around as if he's been shot. Despicable.
 
Somud said:
Gar said:
Somud said:
No, refs have bad games both for and against Barcelona in big matches. So if the ref did all he could to support Barcelona to the final against Inter (despite Inter getting offside goals and commiting penalties and getting free), why did he deny Yaya's game winning assist? Disallowing a game winning goal that would send Barca through to the final just 4 minutes before the end takes some balls by any ref.

Why cant you accept the ref having a bad game and instead you pull the conspiracy card?

What you should be asking yourself about that particular semi final is why Sneijder and co. whiped the grass with Barca in the first leg.

Getting a result on bad days is crucial for any team. If the ref actually wanted to help Barcelona against Inter, why did all these decisions go against Barcelona? It just doesnt make sense? Maybe they should have cancelled the Inter first leg because of the volcano eruption which meant flying to the game was impossible? Wouldnt that be in line with this conspiracy?

I hope City draw Barca in the CL next year so you can get one of those spiffy half/half scarfs.
 
CTID86 said:
Somud said:
CTID86 said:
Bit convenient when almost every ref has a "bad game" in the big matches which involve Barcelona.

No, refs have bad games both for and against Barcelona in big matches. So if the ref did all he could to support Barcelona to the final against Inter (despite Inter getting offside goals and commiting penalties and getting free), why did he deny Yaya's game winning assist? Disallowing a game winning goal that would send Barca through to the final just 4 minutes before the end takes some balls by any ref.

Why cant you accept the ref having a bad game and instead you pull the conspiracy card?

Keep harping on about Yaya's handball. It looked like a handball. He thought it was a handball and so he had to give it.

What offside goal are you talking about?

Why can't you accept that refs in general tend to favour Barcelona? Not all refs, but the majority.

-- Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:00 pm --

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5x0iM0oQps[/youtube]

LOL, he "had to give it" because of what? So that ref that you previously claimed was bent because of the Inter red card is not bent any longer and not part of the conspiracy anymore?

In the first leg, Milito's goal was offside. Barcelona was also denied a stone wall penalty. Whats up with the conspiracies? Why is it so hard to see that even among the socalled ties where Barca have been helped, it is easy to find game changing decisions that also go against them? Doesnt that prove that there is no conspiracy?
 
Somud said:
CTID86 said:
Somud said:
No, refs have bad games both for and against Barcelona in big matches. So if the ref did all he could to support Barcelona to the final against Inter (despite Inter getting offside goals and commiting penalties and getting free), why did he deny Yaya's game winning assist? Disallowing a game winning goal that would send Barca through to the final just 4 minutes before the end takes some balls by any ref.

Why cant you accept the ref having a bad game and instead you pull the conspiracy card?

Keep harping on about Yaya's handball. It looked like a handball. He thought it was a handball and so he had to give it.

What offside goal are you talking about?

Why can't you accept that refs in general tend to favour Barcelona? Not all refs, but the majority.

-- Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:00 pm --

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5x0iM0oQps[/youtube]

LOL, he "had to give it" because of what? So that ref that you previously claimed was bent because of the Inter red card is not bent any longer and not part of the conspiracy anymore?

In the first leg, Milito's goal was offside. Barcelona was also denied a stone wall penalty.


I'm not a conspiracy theorist, so perhaps you should try and be a little less condescending.

If you see a handball (it looked like a blatant handball from his angle), how can you not give it?

And I don't recall ever saying that he was bent, or that he was apart of a conspiracy... Perhaps you can find the post where I said that?

All I'm implying is that his decisions certainly favoured Barcelona in that second leg.

Also, Milito's goal was not that clear-cut. He was about 5 inches offside.
 
Gar said:
Somud said:
Gar said:
What you should be asking yourself about that particular semi final is why Sneijder and co. whiped the grass with Barca in the first leg.

Getting a result on bad days is crucial for any team. If the ref actually wanted to help Barcelona against Inter, why did all these decisions go against Barcelona? It just doesnt make sense? Maybe they should have cancelled the Inter first leg because of the volcano eruption which meant flying to the game was impossible? Wouldnt that be in line with this conspiracy?

I hope City draw Barca in the CL next year so you can get one of those spiffy half/half scarfs.

I dont believe in any UEFA conspiracy nonsense favoring Barcelona, thats all. If that hurt your feelings so much so be it.
 
PLEASE SOMEONE READ MY COMMENT

NO NEWS WEBSITES HAVE NOTICED THIS :

IN THE FIRST PENALTY, MESSI WAS IN OFFSIDE POSITION

someone spread the news

MESSI WAS OFFSIDE IN THE PLAY THAT CAUSED THE PENALTY

THE SECOND PENALTY WAS ALREADY PROVEN THAT PUYOL PUSHED, ONE FOUL CANCELS THE OTHERS

WHAT A ROBBERY.. I, AS A MILAN ADMIRER AM FURIOUS... FARSELONA
 
Somud said:
CTID86 said:
Somud said:
No, refs have bad games both for and against Barcelona in big matches. So if the ref did all he could to support Barcelona to the final against Inter (despite Inter getting offside goals and commiting penalties and getting free), why did he deny Yaya's game winning assist? Disallowing a game winning goal that would send Barca through to the final just 4 minutes before the end takes some balls by any ref.

Why cant you accept the ref having a bad game and instead you pull the conspiracy card?

Keep harping on about Yaya's handball. It looked like a handball. He thought it was a handball and so he had to give it.

What offside goal are you talking about?

Why can't you accept that refs in general tend to favour Barcelona? Not all refs, but the majority.

-- Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:00 pm --

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5x0iM0oQps[/youtube]

LOL, he "had to give it" because of what? So that ref that you previously claimed was bent because of the Inter red card is not bent any longer and not part of the conspiracy anymore?

In the first leg, Milito's goal was offside. Barcelona was also denied a stone wall penalty. Whats up with the conspiracies? Why is it so hard to see that even among the socalled ties where Barca have been helped, it is easy to find game changing decisions that also go against them? Doesnt that prove that there is no conspiracy?

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl3tfFdPTHY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl3tfFdPTHY</a>

Not only was Milito's goal not offside, but he was also not offside when the flag went up in the first half robbing him of a clear cut one on one opportunity and another triple rete!
 
boloyev said:
PLEASE SOMEONE READ MY COMMENT

NO NEWS WEBSITES HAVE NOTICED THIS :

IN THE FIRST PENALTY, MESSI WAS IN OFFSIDE POSITION

someone spread the news

MESSI WAS OFFSIDE IN THE PLAY THAT CAUSED THE PENALTY

THE SECOND PENALTY WAS ALREADY PROVEN THAT PUYOL PUSHED, ONE FOUL CANCELS THE OTHERS

WHAT A ROBBERY.. I, AS A MILAN ADMIRER AM FURIOUS... FARSELONA
Dear god man. On what planet is this not a penalty?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4mUncpN4ak[/youtube]

If a rag did this to Balotelli and no penalty awared, Bluemoon would go into meltdown over ref corruption.
 
CTID86 said:
Somud said:
CTID86 said:
Keep harping on about Yaya's handball. It looked like a handball. He thought it was a handball and so he had to give it.

What offside goal are you talking about?

Why can't you accept that refs in general tend to favour Barcelona? Not all refs, but the majority.

-- Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:00 pm --

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5x0iM0oQps[/youtube]

LOL, he "had to give it" because of what? So that ref that you previously claimed was bent because of the Inter red card is not bent any longer and not part of the conspiracy anymore?

In the first leg, Milito's goal was offside. Barcelona was also denied a stone wall penalty.


I'm not a conspiracy theorist, so perhaps you should try and be a little less condescending.

If you see a handball (it looked like a blatant handball from his angle), how can you not give it?

And I don't recall ever saying that he was bent, or that he was apart of a conspiracy... Perhaps you can find the post where I said that?

All I'm implying is that his decisions certainly favoured Barcelona in that second leg.

Also, Milito's goal was not that clear-cut. He was about 5 inches offside.

You are the one who say that refs "bend over for Barcelona in every game"

You are becoming ridiculous when you have to defend all these bad decisions that go against Barcelona in games that supposedly are evidence of bending over for them. Why you are not satisfied with saying that the refs do make mistakes in high profile games, only you would know.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.