Barclays caught fiddling!(All the banks now!)

Re: Barclays caught fiddling!

News coming through now of yet more taxpayers money going directly to all banks in the Eurozone.

Like the gambling addicts at the Las Vegas slots, this money and subsequent bail outs will no doubt be spunked away by the "casino" side of the business whilst the public face begs for more.

I wonder how much Dave has been able to find down the side of the sofa for this?
 
Re: Barclays caught fiddling!

581959_263549373745672_1518988604_n.jpg
 
Re: Barclays caught fiddling!

These bankers who said if they werent paid huge wages and massive bonus they would move abroad. Well have they fucked off yet?

Its time for the good of the country to nationalise the banks and then they could work for the good of the nation rather than for the fat cat leeches who are sucking the nation dry.
 
Re: Barclays caught fiddling!

tueartsboots said:

Only thing missing is the next part of the conversation in which they discuss what out of the public services/welfare state/NHS they can cut in order to do it.
 
Re: Barclays caught fiddling!

Fuck the banks. I don't mind them stealing billions of pounds.

It's old people, children and the disabled that I fucking hate, all getting their 2k a week giros and most of them are black.

It's all Labour's fault, we just need to give Dave 50 or so years to correct the evils of the Labour party and we'll all be laughing.
 
Re: Barclays caught fiddling!

Blah, blah fucking blah....

Interesting he says nothing can stop bad behaviour in the city. Maybe a long time in jail would be a start instead of the usual half arsed apology and telling us you will forgo your bonus for the year.

<a class="postlink" href="http://news.sky.com/story/954031/king-uk-banking-culture-must-change" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://news.sky.com/story/954031/king-u ... ust-change</a>
 
Re: Barclays caught fiddling!

RBS boss to forgo his bonus of £2m.
 
Re: Barclays caught fiddling!

Damocles said:
twinkletoes said:
Wait until SWP's back and metalblue see this thread.

You will be severely rebuked.

The media sensationalise things, as we all know. SWPs Back will know the nuts and bolts of it.

Say what you like about the lads, but we all have our particular specialties in knowledge and we should listen to the experts. I had no idea that Libor even existed before reading that article, so my opinion on this is as useful as my dogs.

It isn't that hard to understand Damocles.

Libor stands for London inter bank offered rate.

Barclays have been sending internal emails from one department to another that should never be on the same network anyway.

The narrative is that emails were exchanged which allowed people to invest money with complete certainty and profit for themselves and the bank.

The other side to it is that Barclays weren't exposed to rescuing Halifax Bank of Scotland and Royal Bank of Scotland in 2008 and manipulated LIBOR downwards to demonstrate their lack of exposure to the crisis.
 
Re: Barclays caught fiddling!

metalblue said:
blueinsa said:
Rammy Blue said:
Very diplomatically put, metalblue, or as I usually say, "spoken like a true banker..." ;-)

My own opinion, and one that I am sure is shared by millions of people out there, is that the whole "point" of the banking system is to make it as complicated as is feasibly possible so that manipulation of figures is easy in order to post false profits and ensure maximum bonus payments, hence the exact reason all this shit is hitting the fan now about Barclays and the libor as well as the one to come out soon about the interest rate swaps.

More important, and one that will make everyone's toes curl, is when the derivatives timebomb explodes - I'd love to hear your views on that one....iirc the derivatives market was last estimated at approx $700 trillion, and that's one hell of a lot of fresh air when the ponzi scheme collapses.

Just spent 10 mins reading up on this and all i can say is wow!

If just one of the big 5 banks up to its neck in these goes tits up, there is not enough capital out there to cover it!


You'll be looking at the notional value rather than the at risk number

Example:

I buy 1 lot of copper (25 metric tonnes) at $7,400 per mt then my notional value is 25x7400=$185,000 and the person who sold it has the same notional value...so right now 1 lot of copper has created notional of $370,000 (depending on how calculated) and around 20,000 lots were traded in copper today alone. So what is at risk, well we can all agree the chances of copper going to a value of zero is nil so it is something less than the notional...what the exchange does is take a view on the potential move of copper, they will start by saying for my 1 lot I have to pay $3,000 and so does the other side (this is the initial margin) then each day the exchange will calculate a new risk (typically referred to as span margin) and you pay this and the profit/loss on the trade and this risk and the initial margin (this new risk number is based on a worst case scenario for the following day and if you don't pay the exchange liquidate the trade - the logic is that it is very reactive to market moves and global events).

All that said I do have some reservations about one of the metrics used but how it is used to other models rather than exchange margining. Now this is very basic summary and very quick as i am out bowling so probably has a few errors (and I'll review it later) but you get the idea and we have off exchange contracts that use cash and credit but banks apply strict risk limits and it may surprise you but banks want to stay in business so these risks are well managed.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.