So basically if you do everything right, are lucky, & City fuck up, you can beat them.
Can't disagree with that.
Familiar assessment
So basically if you do everything right, are lucky, & City fuck up, you can beat them.
Can't disagree with that.
Yep and certainly nothing about stopping Liverpool all those years ago either.don't remember such a detailed or indeed any analysis like this when the rags were dominating the league, I could be wrong but I think the BBC could be biased.
#lovingthehurt.
Yes of course it is. and also as our style of play is so different to the status quo its worthy of debate whether you press high to stop our control of the ball or defend deep so the likes of KDB, Silva are not able to slip passes inside the fullbacks for the pace of Sane and Sterling to exploit. Enjoyable read.
The rags never got 100pts, 106 goals nor did they smash every record imaginable in one season.
I thought it was a legit article tbf, we were so dominant last season that it's bound to be a topic of debate ahead of the new season.
Yep where is the discussion about changing english football to play better more entertaining football like we do,we are doing it with a few english players so it can be done,Southgate is trying it so debate that,how to stop us but not how to stop other title winners does not seem to me to be a positive thing,we all know how the discussion would be going if it was anyone else,i never hear how to stop the dippers winning for exampleNo problem with the article, as others have said I take it as a compliment.
Just surprised how little has been made in the media about Pep showing how outdated the coaching and management is in this country in general. He wouldn't be able to do it here remember, PL is too quick, too physical, too difficult etc. Pep has shown how over-rated the PL is.
At least this may convince clubs to try and play a bit of football, rather than getting on the Pulis, Allardyce, Hodgson, Pardew merry go round