BBC licence fee

Said it before and I'll say it again. As soon as they can adopt the tech then yeah great - those of us who pay get the TV, radio and on line content. Those who don't lose it. Go on a TV channel on whatever platform Sky or Freeview - blank screen - turn on your radio - dead air - go online - page not available. Go on DAVE to watch a repeat of HIGNFY or similar - blank screen...then yay the defund the BBC warriors have won. They don't want to pay coz they don't watch it ...mission accomplished.
 
You have no reasonable response so resort to being a muppet. Have a good evening.
You were not being serious so I took the extreme position just like you.

You cant see that because you dont want to see it.
 
These two factors along with social media campaigns funded from alleged dubious sources will bring about the change imo.
They are not alleged, they are fact.

I have provided evidence in this thread. Its a cabal of extreme right wingers who see the BBC as a prime asset to be sold off to their mates for profit. That fucking idiot Grimes is involved and he is a puppet for nefarious interest.

They have used obvious propaganda tactics to discredit the BBC, which does have its faults, one of which is that it is massively underfunded. it also tries to hard to be unbiased which means the likes of that **** Farage are on the BBC far more than most politicians. That attempt to be unbiased has skewed the bias towards the extreme.

And nobody has answered this, who will provide the technical expertise that the British film and TV industry need when the BBC has gone. This country by dent of language has a huge advantage over the rest of the world and the BBC is world renowned and the soft power projected by the BBC is vital for the national interest.

People concentrating on content, totally miss the point of the BBC , i don't watch much of it to be honest but when it has gone it will never come back and the media companies that move in will have no interest in bringing through the next wave of technicians we need or have interest in projecting softpower.

As per fucking normal, the capitalist class sniff profit and they hate anything that they cannot profit from, that in itself should be a reason to keep it even it showed the Clangers on repeat 24/7

There is also local radio which free gives out vital information that people need in times of crisis. Floodwatch etc, these will become needed more and more. Why would a private company have any interest in doing this. There is no profit in public announcements.

And my point still stands I made in a flippant manner yesterday. People don't use it so don't want to fund it, I dont use nuclear weapons and i dont want to fund them, should i be allowed to opt out of funding them. I dont like the Queen can i opt out of funding the Queen. I dont use the M9 can i opt out of paying for its upkeep.

This is where extreme privatisation takes you, i will still be expected to fund things i dont like whilst the capitalists make money out of things i do like.
 
They are not alleged, they are fact.

I have provided evidence in this thread. Its a cabal of extreme right wingers who see the BBC as a prime asset to be sold off to their mates for profit. That fucking idiot Grimes is involved and he is a puppet for nefarious interest.

They have used obvious propaganda tactics to discredit the BBC, which does have its faults, one of which is that it is massively underfunded. it also tries to hard to be unbiased which means the likes of that **** Farage are on the BBC far more than most politicians. That attempt to be unbiased has skewed the bias towards the extreme.

And nobody has answered this, who will provide the technical expertise that the British film and TV industry need when the BBC has gone. This country by dent of language has a huge advantage over the rest of the world and the BBC is world renowned and the soft power projected by the BBC is vital for the national interest.

People concentrating on content, totally miss the point of the BBC , i don't watch much of it to be honest but when it has gone it will never come back and the media companies that move in will have no interest in bringing through the next wave of technicians we need or have interest in projecting softpower.

As per fucking normal, the capitalist class sniff profit and they hate anything that they cannot profit from, that in itself should be a reason to keep it even it showed the Clangers on repeat 24/7

There is also local radio which free gives out vital information that people need in times of crisis. Floodwatch etc, these will become needed more and more. Why would a private company have any interest in doing this. There is no profit in public announcements.

And my point still stands I made in a flippant manner yesterday. People don't use it so don't want to fund it, I dont use nuclear weapons and i dont want to fund them, should i be allowed to opt out of funding them. I dont like the Queen can i opt out of funding the Queen. I dont use the M9 can i opt out of paying for its upkeep.

This is where extreme privatisation takes you, i will still be expected to fund things i dont like whilst the capitalists make money out of things i do like.
Agreed. The public service broadcaster keeps c.14 million households (as per 2019 OFCOM say around half of households currently subscribe to at least one service and the ONS say there are 27.8M households) from paying more than just the licence fee, so that is a big market for the likes of Netflix, Amazon etc. No wonder some quarters want the BBC defunded.

There is however a problem for the future because the younger population don't have any loyalty to the BBC. It will have to change in the near future one would feel. Not sure how it does that.
 
F*ck Blue Peter

F*ck Dr Who

I'm sticking with netflix.
Dr Who, there’s a good example of go woke, go broke, viewing figures nosedived. Zoe Ball, loses 1 million listeners and gets a £1million pay rise, so a quid for everyone who binned it.
Only publicly funded organisations can operate like this, and it’s a big reason why those sacking it off are growing rapidly.
 
It’s an outdated service that has for many been surpassed by alternatives. The debate should be around funding of the outdated service. There is no valid reason that I can think of why it shouldn’t be a subscription service, that then gives folk the option of paying or not. Debating the actual content would be a never ending argument. Some folk love it and others don’t. Those folk that appreciate it and want it to continue can subscribe, those who don’t enjoy it can opt out. Everyone’s happy.
Thereby lies the problem for them, make the subscription optional, and those that love it can pay it, if it’s so great, everyone will. They know, everyone knows, the truth is, they won’t
 
Agreed. The public service broadcaster keeps c.14 million households (as per 2019 OFCOM say around half of households currently subscribe to at least one service and the ONS say there are 27.8M households) from paying more than just the licence fee, so that is a big market for the likes of Netflix, Amazon etc. No wonder some quarters want the BBC defunded.

There is however a problem for the future because the younger population don't have any loyalty to the BBC. It will have to change in the near future one would feel. Not sure how it does that.
I would scrap the licence fee and make sure the BBC is funded properly through general taxation so it could meet the needs of all the population
 
I have no loyalty at all to the bbc. The rosey nostalgic image portrayed by some on here is laughable. It’s an outdated service that shouldn’t be forced upon folk. If people don’t use its content they should be free to ingest their media and spend there money where they want. ‘Flood watch’ hahaha. Maybe 30 years ago. Local radio keeping folk up to date with local matters. Maybe 30 years ago. The internet has taken over that function. Farage is on more then most politicians because boris is restricting access to his lot and if they just had the other parties on they’d be unbalanced politically. Although the bbc does employ Laura kunessberg which is like having access to a Tory politician on tap.
Some things the commercial sector do better. Netflix for content wipes the floor with the bbc from an entertainment aspect. News is much better digested from several different sources that way you can make your own mind up. Sports is non existent. The main radio station is absolute bollocks anyway but I agree there are some interesting and informative programs on some of the other stations. TBH it doesn’t really matter what any of us want because the funding model will need changing as more and more people opt out of paying.
Im not against the BBC I just think in the main it’s rubbish and I don’t agree that we should have to pay for a service we don’t use. I’m basically being made to pay for a bbc licence so I can watch Netflix, freeview and sky.
 
Thereby lies the problem for them, make the subscription optional, and those that love it can pay it, if it’s so great, everyone will. They know, everyone knows, the truth is, they won’t
Ah but the comeback is ‘I don’t want to pay for nuclear submarines so why should I’ or it’s selfish for me to not pay even if I don’t use because others do.
A subscription model would bring it up to date and allow those who enjoy it to continue and those who don’t would be free to spend their hard earned money where they choose. It would also reduce the amount of criticism it receives.
There’s a few on here that are living in past years of elstree studios being the Mecca of film and tv. £86m on a new set for Eastenders??. Over £1b spent on bbc 1 alone and folk are saying it’s not properly funded. This years budget is just short of £5b and for that we get the embarrassment that is the bbc 1 program line up and Zoe ball.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.