Beer ''must be sold at the World Cup'' FIFA insist

Mad Eyed Screamer

Moderator
Joined
26 Nov 2010
Messages
43,800
Location
Did I mention I'd been on Eggheads?
Who says FIFA are out of touch??!!
They might be able to get away with it in Brazil, but what about Qatar?!!!!!!

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-16624823" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-16624823</a>

Beer must be sold at all venues hosting matches in the 2014 World Cup in Brazil, football's world governing body, Fifa, has insisted.

Fifa General Secretary Jerome Valcke said the right to sell beer must be enshrined in a World Cup law the Brazilian Congress is considering.

Alcoholic drinks are currently banned at Brazilian stadiums and the country's health minister has urged Congress to maintain the ban in the new law.

Brewer Budweiser is a big Fifa sponsor.

Mr Valcke is visiting Brazil to press for progress on the much-delayed World Cup law.
'Won't negotiate'

Fifa has become frustrated because voting on the legislation has been held up in Congress by the dispute over alcohol sales.

The Brazilian government has also failed to resolve differences with Fifa over cut-price tickets for students and senior citizens, and demands for sponsors of the World Cup to have their trademarks protected.

The profile of World Cup supporters will be radically different from that of domestic Brazilian football, where violence is fuelled by club rivalries.

But this is not about violence, or even beer. It is about sovereignty.

Fifa makes all sorts of demands on a World Cup host nation, from tax waivers to the necessity to provide stadiums, transport and hotel infra-structure - controversial issues in the developing world, where there are so many claims on the public purse.

Largely because of poor domestic organisation, the costs of staging the tournament are spiralling. But one area where Brazil's government can flex its muscles is that of sovereignty - which is why beer sales and ticket prices, governed by local law, are now the front line in the tension between Brazil and Fifa.

In remarks to journalists in Rio de Janeiro, Mr Valcke sounded frustrated with Brazilian officials.

"Alcoholic drinks are part of the Fifa World Cup, so we're going to have them. Excuse me if I sound a bit arrogant but that's something we won't negotiate," he said.

"The fact that we have the right to sell beer has to be a part of the law."

Alcohol was banned at Brazilian football matches in 2003 as part of attempts to tackle violence between rival football fans.

The measures have had limited impact, says the BBC's South American football correspondent Tim Vickery.

In order to drink, supporters tend to stay longer outside stadiums, areas that are harder to police than inside.

Much of the football violence in Brazil stems from club rivalries, our correspondent notes. Fans who follow the national side tend to be wealthier and include more women and families.
Builders at the Minerao Stadium in Belo Horizonte (14 December 2011) Mr Valcke criticised the pace of construction at Brazil's world cup venues

Health Minister Alexandre Padilha and other members of Congress have called for the ban to be maintained.

Mr Valcke said negotiations with Brazil over details of the World Cup had been slow.

"We lost a lot of time and we were not able to discuss with people in charge that are willing to make a decision," he said, adding that it was the first time a country was still in talks five years after winning the right to host the tournament.

During his visit to Brazil, Mr Valcke has been touring the stadiums in 12 cities where the 2014 World Cup will be played.

He criticised the pace of construction and said Brazil had not yet improved its infrastructure to the level needed to welcome visitors.
 
You'd think that if this was (as FIFA claim) a non-negotiable part of hosting a world cup, then FIFA would check on whether a country allows it before awarding the competition to the country.

In this case, then Brazil would have set their stall out early on and FIFA would have had leverage from the outset. "Serve beer, or the World Cup can go elsewhere".

I know a lot of detail can get lost in big schemes but surely FIFA have at least a check list of what a host nation should sign up to support, before they get the gig?

On the question of Quatar, I don't think it will be such an issue there to be honest. Firstly, they're tolerant of alcohol at certain venues as it stands, and secondly, as it's their first ever tournament of this size then I doubt they'd want to rock the boat with FIFA so early in their relationship. Plus Quataris are quite thirsty people anyway, behind closed doors.
 
England not getting the WC is a shame then as beer would have been allowed at games instead of the fucking lunatic situaton you have now where you can drink as long as you cant see the pitch.....how fucking idiotic is that.

At Cheadle Town who play in the NW counties you can buy beer in the clubhouse but cant drink it in ssight of the pitch and they get around 100 for a home game........How fucking stupid is that.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.