Bellamy or RSC

[keemcfc]

both, we can aford them i think RSC is better tho but 18 million for a player thats been injured for a few months, he might not recover.

no more than 10/12 million for bellamy tho, we dont want teams riping us of for ever.

 

[wrongun73]

We'll probably end up with both

 

[Uwe Rosler's Grandad]

Neither. But if I had to choose, I'd go for Santa Cruz the target man rather than the quick but injury prone troublemaker Bellamy.

 

[Grand Master Ram Rod]

Neither but if I had to pick on then RSC.

 

[i8therags]

both, we can aford them i think RSC is better tho but 18 million for a player thats been injured for a few months, he might not recover.

no more than 10/12 million for bellamy tho, we dont want teams riping us of for ever.

good post rsc is injured and we are only a few months from the end of season-so a quick fix for me is bellamy,get rid in summer.

 

[hillsideblue]

If i had a choice neither, would be happier with RSC in squad than Bellamy but not happy to be bent over to get him by fat boy fat.

 

[phil333]

Neither + parker can fuck off as well.

Would rather have paid 20 million for Defoe.

 

[Freestyler]

RSC all day for me.

Mark Hughes claims he can get the best out of RSC and he knows him better than anyone else does, i firmly believe Hughes could turn RSC back to his best, RSC may not be doing much this season but look at his situation, he's playing for a shit team under a shit manager and i believe he doesn't want to even be at rovers, under Hughes he will be a different player

 

[blue 1992]

RSC.

 

[johnmc]

Score so far

RSC 15 - 5 Bellamy

Pretty conclusive