As long as 115 is not added all will be fine!Four defeats in a row
As long as 115 is not added all will be fine!Four defeats in a row
Hang on, your last paragraph. The FA suspension him not City.
So the FA stop him from playing for City so shouldn't he be suing the FA and not City. It was the FA that stopped him from playing.
He broke his contract with City as the FA made him unavailable.
It is just how the law works. I was once involved in a case where an employee killed a work colleague by driving recklessly. He was bang to rights on video but it dragged on for about 12 months. He was suspended but got paid in full right up to the day he was convicted and then sent to prison.I thought this from the off once he was cleared in court. Let's be honest if it was one of us in whatever job we do or did we'd want our wages, rightly arguing we were innocent and shouldn't be financially punished for not being able to do our jobs, due to being falsely accused of something.
Why?utter piece of shit this guy, the mere mention of his name makes me angry
He was still locked up and unavailable to play. As I v said, no crime has formally been committed and he is legally allowed to claim the pay withheld.But he didn't commit a crime? Being a shagger shouldn't mean he gets wrongly accused of a horrible crime and his career and pocket suffer? Being wrongly accused of something is out of his hands surely? Christ if Walker is alright then anybody is.