I don't get the B.Silva > Isco opinion if i'm being honest. Yes he has been good this season but Isco still is a far better player in my opinion. I think majority of us got impressed by his performance against us the other night and rightly so, but apart from really good dribbling and a few cut through passes he wasn't that influential in their final third. Yes he has the potential to become a top top player, but so does Isco. He is still just 2 years older than Silva.
I think Isco has been really good for Real whenever he has played and I think his lack of regular game time has taken a toll on his repo among us fans.
Bernardo Silva has 6 goals and 7 assists (inc. pen) in 1950 minutes for Monaco in the French League. Whereas, Isco has just played half of that (973minutes) and already has 5 goals and 5 assists, in a far tougher league.
Considering all that and the fact that we could get him for 1/3rd of Silva's price makes it a no brainer for me.