not renew him and sell him next summer
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Bernardo Silva
- Thread starter Taylor
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
probably not giving him a new contract if he can just very easily leave the very next year without having to negotiate with the club while doubling his wages.No I’m blind . Tell me what other smart options would you advise the board?
giving him like 300k a week is dumb if hes leaving next year
Why, if he deserves it?
Blue_Lightsaber
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Feb 2022
- Messages
- 2,613
- Team supported
- Man City
this bernardo RC news is either bollocks or the clubs taking the piss. i dont see how it makes sense. without the new deal, hed have 2 years left, 1 year left next summer which means wed be forced to accept lower bids or lose him on a free the very next summer.
with the new deal, you basically double his wages and still let him leave next summer for 47m? that is just stupid.
If the RC clause is true.. it could be good for us for 3 reasons:
1. It basically prevents all of the barca loan + option bullshit and makes it.. either pay us in 1 lump sum or shut the fuck up!
2. without RC we'd have only 1 year left next year, and we don't want to lose him for as little as Kovacic. (Most of us have been resigned to losing him with a year left anyways, but this gives us a bigger fee).
3. If the RC isn't triggered by someone Bernardo likes.. he stays an extra year.
Chi-town blues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2012
- Messages
- 31,363
probably not giving him a new contract if he can just very easily leave the very next year without having to negotiate with the club while doubling his wages.
So you call board‘s decision to renew “ stupid” without bothering your highest IQ that there’s no buyers out there and the only club he maybe interested is literally bankrupt.not renew him and sell him next summer
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 29,445
It would be if the release kicked it straight away, except it won't so not mad.ask WHU to renew with Paqueta today for double the salary for 3 years but with an active RC clause from today of 47m.
which we can come in and activate.
thats how fucking mad this is...
S
S
Summerbuzz
Guest
It's called "an agreement". It's hardly reasonable to repeatedly say he can go, then to expect him to sign something that makes it almost impossible.
Many moving parts in City's business. Mendes is one of them. He has extracted the price for ending this summer's uncertainty. Thanks to KDB's injury and us running light on midfielders for years, he has us over a barrel.
Think of it as public recognition for a great servant.
Many moving parts in City's business. Mendes is one of them. He has extracted the price for ending this summer's uncertainty. Thanks to KDB's injury and us running light on midfielders for years, he has us over a barrel.
Think of it as public recognition for a great servant.
Love it. He's now settled for a couple of years, getting fairly compensated for his importance, we're guaranteed a fee that while is low for his quality keeps him happy that he can move and us happy that we'll have time to source (or develop!) a suitable replacement. Goodwill both sides and now full focus. Wallop
So you call board‘s decision to renew “ stupid” without bothering your highest IQ that there’s no buyers out there and the only club he maybe interested is literally bankrupt.
yeah, you are absolutely clueless.So you call board‘s decision to renew “ stupid” without bothering your highest IQ that there’s no buyers out there and the only club he maybe interested is literally bankrupt.
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Why do some people think they know better than the wonderful City Board ??
- Status
- Not open for further replies.