betfair in meltdown

I have read through this thread and have no idea still.. Who bet 22 mil did he win or lose,? What should he have won? What is a lay? Is that a bet?
I think this bet fair you can bet whilst the race is on? Then some mare is romping it and it said the odds was 28/1 ? Then everyone placed a bet? Is this what has happened?
 
cbeebies is poo said:
I have read through this thread and have no idea still.. Who bet 22 mil did he win or lose,? What should he have won? What is a lay? Is that a bet?
I think this bet fair you can bet whilst the race is on? Then some mare is romping it and it said the odds was 28/1 ? Then everyone placed a bet? Is this what has happened?
this, can someone explain this in english please
 
a lay is when u are betting on the horse/team/player to lose.
someone layed a horse at 29s for 800k (they tried to lay it for 22m)
the horse won costing the layer 23m.
 
route46 said:
a lay is when u are betting on the horse/team/player to lose.
someone layed a horse at 29s for 800k (they tried to lay it for 22m)
the horse won costing the layer 23m.
If they didn't get it the first time round, how is simply repeating the same gobbeldegook going to help?

From what I can gather, betfair is somewhere where you bet against eachother, someone clicked the wrong button and now he should owe 23 million pounds to loads of people, but no-one's going to get paid.
 
But the guy didn't have the money in his account did he and you aren't allowed to bet on credit. Therefore the bet was illegal but somehow dodged the validation system. Plus the horse was still showing at a ludicrous price when it was streets ahead.

Something very fishy here and they were right not to pay out.
 
i have no issue wiv betfair not paying out,
but the guys balance shud be paid out, doesnt matter if thats £10 or 20m.
 
Blue Si O.B said:
cbeebies is poo said:
I have read through this thread and have no idea still.. Who bet 22 mil did he win or lose,? What should he have won? What is a lay? Is that a bet?
I think this bet fair you can bet whilst the race is on? Then some mare is romping it and it said the odds was 28/1 ? Then everyone placed a bet? Is this what has happened?
this, can someone explain this in english please

I'll have a go. Firstly, Betfair isn't like a normal bookie. It's basically like having a bet with an individual rather than a company. Say you think City will win the league and your mate disgarees and you have a tenner on it. Betfair just facilitaties that difference of opinion online, and they take a percentage of the profit for doing so, that's how they make their money. So, if William Hill are offering a horse at 2/1, but I think it stands no chance of winning, I could offer 3/1 on Betfair, and anyone wanting to back it might choose to take my better odds. Take the position of something not winning is called laying.

Now, as Betfair don't stump up any money themselves, there has to be someone out there with enough funds to cover the bet you want to make. Say you want to stick £500,000 on city to win at Sunderland at even money. You can only do it if there's one or more people who think city won't win at Sunderland and are preapred to stake the £500,000 needed to match you bet. Obviously, with horses this gets more serious, if you want to stick £1000 on a horse at 100/1 then there has to be someone willing to stake £100,000 that it won't win in order to take your grand from you.

Just a quick thing about decimal odds. It's pretty simply, 28/1 becomes 29.00 because it represents how much you'd get back per £ bet. On betfair, the lowest odds available are 1.01, which is essentially 1/100. The maximum odds are 1000 (999/1).

On betfair, betting is allowed on horses during the race itself. Naturally, the prices fluctuate depending on how likely the horse is to win. The markets stay active right up to the point where the winner passes the line. So, let's say that Horse A is 20 lengths clear of the field with 5 yards to go to the finish line, you could still back it to win, but you'd only get odds of 1.01. People are prepared to offer this because occasionally horses get disqualified at if that happens they're quids in.

The horse today was 2.96 before the off, which is slightly less than 2/1. Shortly after the race starter, the price had gone all the way out to 29.00. Fluctations this large can happen, for example if a horse hits the first fence, or misses the start and is suddenly 30 lengths behind, but in this instance there was nothing obvious to justify the price. The more unusual thing was how much was available from the layer. As I said earlier, Betfair doesn't stump up any cash itself, so if you want to back something there has to be someone on the other side of the fence with enough money to lay it. In this instance, there was £24,000,000 available from the "layer" which could have left them with a liability of £600 million. However, only £1.6 million of their £24million was actually matched, so the layers liability was less (around £29million).

The horse travelled well trhoughout the race and jumped the last hurdle with a big lead, even at this point, instead of being 1.01, it was still 29.00 because the layer hadn't withdrawn the bet.

An increasing number of professional gamblers employ computer programmes ("bots") to automatically seek arbitration in markets, much like bankers do. Regular high-stakes Betfair customers are also strongly rumoured to have limitless credit accounts. Something has gone wrong here, because no one could have £600 million in there account, but the big issue is that if the horse hadn't won, the account holder would have won £800k. As it lost, he/she is not being asked to pay the liability.

There is precedent. A few years ago a guy accidentally offered 1000 on a favourite as it left the starting stalls, it was matched and he lost £250k. Betfair said it was his error and the bets stand.

Hope that helps
 
so what dont u understand about that prestwich blue?????
if the market has been void he still has a balance<br /><br />-- Thu Dec 29, 2011 2:42 am --<br /><br />well explained leeonepen
 
route46 said:
so what dont u understand about that prestwich blue?????
if the market has been void he still has a balance

-- Thu Dec 29, 2011 2:42 am --

well explained leeonepen
Yes well explained thanks. I understand now.

So the end result is that everyone is no worse off than when they started as everyone gets back what they staked. The guy clearly didn't have £23m in his account so shouldn't have been allowed to lay the bet in the first place. Clearly there has been a major technical glitch which is different from a punter's mistake, where he does have the money to settle the bet.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
route46 said:
so what dont u understand about that prestwich blue?????
if the market has been void he still has a balance

-- Thu Dec 29, 2011 2:42 am --

well explained leeonepen
Yes well explained thanks. I understand now.

So the end result is that everyone is no worse off than when they started as everyone gets back what they staked. The guy clearly didn't have £23m in his account so shouldn't have been allowed to lay the bet in the first place. Clearly there has been a major technical glitch which is different from a punter's mistake, where he does have the money to settle the bet.
Yes..no one loses any money.

I think everyone who placed bets on the said horse just seen an opportunity & took it & hoped to hell it would pay off..
 
A publicity stunt? It's getting a lot of media attention! Like they say any publicity is good publicity...........
 
The cookie monster said:
Hamann Pineapple said:
If the horse had lost would the bets have been void ?

Nobody will ever know the answer to that..

Betfair will say yes obviously!

Well there must be small print acceptable to regulators otherwise they could void any bets they choose after a "customer" lays any winning horse at generous odds. Surely a legal challenge and fines are in order for Betfair at the least.
 
mdmcfc said:
So is there a maximum you can place on a lay? Meaning could I but odds of 10s but total against my lay 10 bets so I knew I could lose a max of £100?
If you layed a horse at say 10/1 then that would be 11.00 betfair terms & you only wanted to lose £100 max if the horse did win...then anyone could have up to £10 on...

Is that any clearer?
 
The cookie monster said:
mdmcfc said:
So is there a maximum you can place on a lay? Meaning could I but odds of 10s but total against my lay 10 bets so I knew I could lose a max of £100?
If you layed a horse at say 10/1 then that would be 11.00 betfair terms & you only wanted to lose £100 max if the horse did win...then anyone could have up to £10 on...

Is that any clearer?
But you would need to have that £100 in your account as I understand it and that, I would imagine, is part of the site's T&C's.

The problem from Betfair's point of view is that gambling on credit (i.e. stake now, pay later) is not illegal as such but there is no remedy in law to enable the person who is owed the money to recover it under those circumstances. Therefore it seems unlikely that the debt could have been enforced anyway.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
The cookie monster said:
mdmcfc said:
So is there a maximum you can place on a lay? Meaning could I but odds of 10s but total against my lay 10 bets so I knew I could lose a max of £100?
If you layed a horse at say 10/1 then that would be 11.00 betfair terms & you only wanted to lose £100 max if the horse did win...then anyone could have up to £10 on...

Is that any clearer?
But you would need to have that £100 in your account as I understand it and that, I would imagine, is part of the site's T&C's.

The problem from Betfair's point of view is that gambling on credit (i.e. stake now, pay later) is not illegal as such but there is no remedy in law to enable the person who is owed the money to recover it under those circumstances. Therefore it seems unlikely that the debt could have been enforced anyway.
Of course he would have to have a minimum of £100 in his account yes..
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top