Bill Roache, Not Guilty (page 23)

Someone will have to explain to me why Ian Watkins was in custody throughout whilst Stuart Hall (guilty), Bill Roache (not guilty) and Rolf Harris (as yet unknown) have all been free to go about their business until the trial. I know very little about this.
 
peoffrey said:
Someone will have to explain to me why Ian Watkins was in custody throughout whilst Stuart Hall (guilty), Bill Roache (not guilty) and Rolf Harris (as yet unknown) have all been free to go about their business until the trial. I know very little about this.
Video evidence?
 
peoffrey said:
Someone will have to explain to me why Ian Watkins was in custody throughout whilst Stuart Hall (guilty), Bill Roache (not guilty) and Rolf Harris (as yet unknown) have all been free to go about their business until the trial. I know very little about this.

Seriousness of charges, risk of flight, amount of bail, danger to public, etc.
 
Indestructable said:
Stuart Halls solicitor must be rubbish.....

It usually works like this.
Solicitor: 5 women say you raped or indecently assaulted them but other than that there is no other evidence. I suggest you run a Not Guilty.
Ken Barlow: OK

OR

Solicitor. 5 different women, who have never met each other have all separately said you wore an Elvis mask, a rag shirt and sang the national anthem whilst raping them. They can't all have made up the exact same story, getting the description and everything else the same, I suggest you plead.
Stuart Hall: OK

Now in Mr Halls defence he didn't wear a rag shirt, not even Hall is that perverted but I take it you get the drift.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
Great post, Blue silk.
Thanks for taking time out to explain.

Whilst I agree, I think my post covered the same facts but just did it in a shorter number of words.

just sayin'
 
Blue Mist said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
Great post, Blue silk.
Thanks for taking time out to explain.

Whilst I agree, I think my post covered the same facts but just did it in a shorter number of words.

just sayin'

Yours contained the words 'rag shirt', so it loses points for making me wince and glare at the dog.
I know it's harsh, but it's a cruel world out there.
You were doing alright up until that point.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
Blue Mist said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
Great post, Blue silk.
Thanks for taking time out to explain.

Whilst I agree, I think my post covered the same facts but just did it in a shorter number of words.

just sayin'

Yours contained the words 'rag shirt', so it loses points for making me wince and glare at the dog.
I know it's harsh, but it's a cruel world out there.
You were doing alright up until that point.

Yeh I suppose but I don't like posters with names like Blue Silk, that is a blatant attempt to appeal to 'The Laydeeees of this forum and he used big words. Mind you I best not piss him off I might need him soon.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.