That would be a little harsh I think.
But it does remind me exactly of this that I studied at uni:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dutch_tulip_bulb_market_bubble.asp
]
Theres some big difference here though to that famous Bubble
The supply of tulips wassn't fixed bitcoin is fixed. Supply won't outstrip demand with Bitcoin like it did for Tulips.
Bitcoin is durable, Tulips are not. It won't deteriorate over time like Tulips.
Unlike during tulip mania,we live in a time of the internet, worlds more globbaly connected, ecommerce etc, Bitcoin can be used everywhere and is being accepted more and more as form of payment across the clear web, maybe some brick and mortor stores too, Tulips can't do that.
Bitcoin is practical, for example in economies like Venezuela were the local currency is pretty worthless,people are turning to bitcoin to store wealth, tulips serve no real purpose only to be looked at.
You don't need to own a full bitcoin to gain value on it, a quarter of a tulip is worth nothing
Once the Tulip supply outstripped the demand the price crashed. The supply of bitcoin is fixed and will reach a mathematical finite end where no new coins will be generated ever again. There is no way to increase the pace of mining while supply can still be generated in any appreciable way to meet demand as it will only drive the math to its completion sooner and the fixed finite supply will exacerbate the demand further.
For me no valid comparison between the two other than one WAS a bubble and one could be maybe
Not saying its value won't drop at some stage (I do wonder about when do I decide to cash out) and it has some other challenges facing it such fraud of ICOs, banning of crypto-exchanges, etc.