Bobby's in the Agenda Camp

[SWP's back]

One who does not side with the majority must therefore be a Rag

That's your strawman. You are just a rag.

 

[YaYa's Left Peg]

Even they can't argue with his timing. Any preconceptions Lee Mason had of red carding one of our players on Sunday will be difficult now. We could be at full strength for the Derby. It's a sad state of affairs that we even have to consider this.

Was you not at full strength for the previous two derbies? Or was it a case of whoever was reffing City's game prior to the FA Cup derby forgot to send off one of City's players and, as a result, was the reason Foy sent of Kompany just after you had gone behind?

Obviously the only other reason Foy could have sent him off is because he is an utterly dreadful and inept referee.

This rag annoy anyone else?

Yet he maintains he is an Oldham fan.....

 

[Latics Fan SJK]

Barry was sent off in the game preceding the last home derby in the FA cup for two innocuous challenges that led to two bookings, which you can't appeal
So your statement is incorrect

It wasn't a statement, it was a question.

Edit: Was the Barry red card against Liverpool? That 2nd yellow was deserved if you asked me as it was a clear block. Can't remember the 1st though to be honest.

In your biased opinion it would be

Every fair minded person thinks agger deliberately ran him to after losing the ball, hey ho

Why does it have to be a biased opinion? It's my opinion. I won't slag you for having a different one.

I happen to go along with the majority in that it's a joke that Murphy didn't get his penalty or Young managed to get two of them. Does that mean it'd be right for a 'Rag' to label me a City fan?

Does it fuck.<br /><br />-- Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:01 pm --<br /><br />

One who does not side with the majority must therefore be a Rag

That's your strawman. You are just a rag.

I'd call you a **** but I don't want to get banned.

Don't you think I'd be booted off this site in an instant if I was a rag and not be allowed to post close to 1000?

Get a fucking grip. I don't agree with a conspiracy. It doesn't mean I'm a rag.

 

[SWP's back]

It wasn't a statement, it was a question.

Edit: Was the Barry red card against Liverpool? That 2nd yellow was deserved if you asked me as it was a clear block. Can't remember the 1st though to be honest.

In your biased opinion it would be

Every fair minded person thinks agger deliberately ran him to after losing the ball, hey ho

Why does it have to be a biased opinion? It's my opinion. I won't slag you for having a different one.

I happen to go along with the majority in that it's a joke that Murphy didn't get his penalty or Young managed to get two of them. Does that mean it'd be right for a 'Rag' to label me a City fan?

Does it fuck.

You go along with that as it is neigh on impossible to defend the indefensible. They were clearly wrong decisions as my rag mates have agreed. They however, like you, don't think the usually benefit from refereeing decisions.

As opposed to most neutrals that think Utd do.<br /><br />-- Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:03 pm --<br /><br />

I'd call you a **** but I don't want to get banned.

So in effect, you did call me a ****.

And yes, several mods already think you should be booted off mr keyboard warrior.

 

[squirtyflower]

It wasn't a statement, it was a question.

Edit: Was the Barry red card against Liverpool? That 2nd yellow was deserved if you asked me as it was a clear block. Can't remember the 1st though to be honest.

In your biased opinion it would be

Every fair minded person thinks agger deliberately ran him to after losing the ball, hey ho

Why does it have to be a biased opinion? It's my opinion. I won't slag you for having a different one.

i haven't a clue why it is biased but invariably it is
in my opinion

and i wouldn't exactly say it was a 'slagging off', although maybe you do
it's not like i suggested anyone was a ****, like you do

 

[Latics Fan SJK]

In your biased opinion it would be

Every fair minded person thinks agger deliberately ran him to after losing the ball, hey ho

Why does it have to be a biased opinion? It's my opinion. I won't slag you for having a different one.

I happen to go along with the majority in that it's a joke that Murphy didn't get his penalty or Young managed to get two of them. Does that mean it'd be right for a 'Rag' to label me a City fan?

Does it fuck.

You go along with that as it is neigh on impossible to defend the indefensible. They were clearly wrong decisions as my rag mates have agreed. They however, like you, don't think the usually benefit from refereeing decisions.

As opposed to most neutrals that think Utd do.

-- Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:03 pm --

I'd call you a **** but I don't want to get banned.

So in effect, you did call me a ****.

And yes, several mods already think you should be booted off mr keyboard warrior.

So why haven't I been?

This is the only topic where I have gone against the majority on here simply because i have a genuinely different opinion. I've not once been offensive to anyone on here who disagrees with me nor have I caused any fuss.

Yet you seem to wanna label me a 'rag' time after time.

Just foe me if you have an issue. Simple as that. I'm not breaking any rules by having a difference in opinion.

 

[carolyn]

We all know what's going on and so do most of the opposing fans, with the exception of rags. They are all so confident because they DO get all the decisions, knot it, and it's sickening. Bent ref's have cost us this season, and ok we've cocked up a few games ourselves. But, overall the league has been handed to them lot.

 

[BertTrautmann'sParachute]

Why does it have to be a biased opinion? It's my opinion. I won't slag you for having a different one.

I happen to go along with the majority in that it's a joke that Murphy didn't get his penalty or Young managed to get two of them. Does that mean it'd be right for a 'Rag' to label me a City fan?

Does it fuck.

You go along with that as it is neigh on impossible to defend the indefensible. They were clearly wrong decisions as my rag mates have agreed. They however, like you, don't think the usually benefit from refereeing decisions.

As opposed to most neutrals that think Utd do.

-- Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:03 pm --

I'd call you a **** but I don't want to get banned.

So in effect, you did call me a ****.

And yes, several mods already think you should be booted off mr keyboard warrior.

So why haven't I been?

This is the only topic where I have gone against the majority on here simply because i have a genuinely different opinion. I've not once been offensive to anyone on here who disagrees with me nor have I caused any fuss.

Yet you seem to wanna label me a 'rag' time after time.

Just foe me if you have an issue. Simple as that. I'm not breaking any rules by having a difference in opinion.

You come around to this point in every thread you post on. You may not be a rag, but you certainly spend your whole time on Bluemoon winding-up City fans.

 

[jimharri]

Refs are bent. Rags are more bent. Ashley is a twat and so is Wooney. The cretin Mason will be in for some major hair pulling (or is he a bald twat, I can't remember" Anway, if he doesn't give us ten penalties and send off half of the opposition the next time we stoop to allow him to officiate one of our games, the fucker will rue the day. And even ten pens for and six sent off for the opposiont wouldn't put things right. Same with the fornicator, Foy. It comes to something when people are as interested in who the ref is as they are in team selection for games.

NOT ON

Bernstein wants to sort something out now, before the scum cheat their way to the title. I want Mike Dean to ref the rags. He's the only one Fergie can't bully. I want all the others dead.

"And r-e-l-a-x."

 

[Latics Fan SJK]

You go along with that as it is neigh on impossible to defend the indefensible. They were clearly wrong decisions as my rag mates have agreed. They however, like you, don't think the usually benefit from refereeing decisions.

As opposed to most neutrals that think Utd do.

-- Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:03 pm --


So in effect, you did call me a ****.

And yes, several mods already think you should be booted off mr keyboard warrior.

So why haven't I been?

This is the only topic where I have gone against the majority on here simply because i have a genuinely different opinion. I've not once been offensive to anyone on here who disagrees with me nor have I caused any fuss.

Yet you seem to wanna label me a 'rag' time after time.

Just foe me if you have an issue. Simple as that. I'm not breaking any rules by having a difference in opinion.

You come around to this point in every thread you post on. You may not be a rag, but you certainly spend your whole time on Bluemoon winding-up City fans.

Every thread that revolves around the same topic maybe. Nothing else.