Boycotting US stuff

FFS - what a stupid post - and does any one in their tiny mind think that a couple of thousand City fans changing their buying habits would have any impact? no. nothing to see here, move along. I'd rather buy american than european anyway! I'm no interested one bit in supporting the EU, corrupt f**kers
USA! USA! USA!

Imagine thinking the EU is more corrupt than this current incarnation of America.
Whilst nothing will be done and nobody is likely to boycott anything it's still good to know which posters don't have a problem with the current situation.
 
FFS - what a stupid post - and does any one in their tiny mind think that a couple of thousand City fans changing their buying habits would have any impact? no. nothing to see here, move along. I'd rather buy american than european anyway! I'm no interested one bit in supporting the EU, corrupt f**kers
So you would prefer a Mustang or Corvette to a Bentley, Aston or Porsche etc.
 
FFS - what a stupid post - and does any one in their tiny mind think that a couple of thousand City fans changing their buying habits would have any impact? no. nothing to see here, move along. I'd rather buy american than european anyway! I'm no interested one bit in supporting the EU, corrupt f**kers
Couple of Thousand City fans won't make the slightest difference, except out in the real world there are many out there that while not outright boycotting American goods are shopping with an aversion to American goods probably across many countries. That will hurt American companies.
 
Last edited:
You can't boycott everything American, they're too deep rooted into our daily lives for it to be possible. What can be done is a systematic boycott of certain American products, things that are easily replaced with next to no inconvenience. Canadians showed the best example of this when the tariffs first came into play with them boycotting American booze amongst other stuff. If europe and other parts of the world followed their lead, you can cripple certain small parts of their economy.

Organizing a mass boycott like that of anything is the problem, Canadians rallied together after feeling a personal attack on them and the literal threats of invasion from Trump, you kind of need something like that but for the whole of europe to unite people against them.
 
Seriously, the way things are going, we need to wean ourselves off America and its produce ready for the naval blockade.
Alas there is no way to ween ourselves of our ties with the United States our economies are bonded together, it would be silly to even try daft Donald won't be around forever.
 
No,you didn't give any data, you just challenged figures that BKB doesn't like, I suspect because you were one of the 52% that voted to make us all worse off and now are struggling that you are partly to blame for us being in the mess we are. Anyway, the "random source" paints the same picture as the source you do approve of. Last time I checked, 7.9 + 6.9 + 5.8 = 20.6% compared to the 15% (US trade).
I'm afraid that your figures are indeed nonsense and, because I'm a helpful chap and also because God loves a trier (even yourself), I'll show you the real figures and explain why you're wrong.

The first mistake you made was to just glibly accept the data you found as correct, and not question whether the figures quoted were in fact feasible. Most obviously, your data stated that total UK exports in 2024 were the rather dubious figure of USD509bn. At the average 2024 exchange rate, this amounts to just GBP398bn. Given that UK nominal GDP last year was GBP2.88 trillion, this would imply that total UK exports amounted to just under 14% of GDP.

This is obviously bollocks - the actual figure is 31% - and so a quick sense check would have told you that the figures were wrong. In fact the figures you found are (inaccurate) United Nations estimates of UK goods exports, not total exports, and so again the problem here is simply a lack of thought on your behalf.

Total UK exports in 2024 were actually GBP893.2bn; a bit of a difference. Exports to the US were GBP200.8bn (22.5% of the total) last year, while exports to Germany were GBP61.7bn (6.9%), France GBP46.9bn (5.2%) and the Netherlands GBP51bn (5.7%).

Exports in 2024 to the three EU countries you picked out accounted for 17.9% of the total, and were therefore equivalent to just under 80% of the value of exports to the US, as I've previously said. Again, very different from the 150% figure you believe to be true.

All the figures I've quoted here are from the ONS and a handy summary can be found in the Trade and investment core statistics book, published a couple of weeks ago.

I do hope you find this useful, along with @Alan Harper's Tash , @roubaixtuesday and particularly @Phil1, special guy that he is.
 
I do hope you find this useful, along with @Alan Harper's Tash , @roubaixtuesday and particularly @Phil1, special guy that he is

Your figures on exports are correct, my apologies.

The figures on total trade are the other way around; these countries together are more important overall trading partners than the US.

[As an aside, my best understanding is that NL trade figures are somewhat misleading due to the importance of the port of Rotterdam acting as a gateway for the EU. I could be wrong]

The EU is, of course far more important in both regards than the US, which was my original point before this fascinating diversion.
 
I'm afraid that your figures are indeed nonsense and, because I'm a helpful chap and also because God loves a trier (even yourself), I'll show you the real figures and explain why you're wrong.

The first mistake you made was to just glibly accept the data you found as correct, and not question whether the figures quoted were in fact feasible. Most obviously, your data stated that total UK exports in 2024 were the rather dubious figure of USD509bn. At the average 2024 exchange rate, this amounts to just GBP398bn. Given that UK nominal GDP last year was GBP2.88 trillion, this would imply that total UK exports amounted to just under 14% of GDP.

This is obviously bollocks - the actual figure is 31% - and so a quick sense check would have told you that the figures were wrong. In fact the figures you found are (inaccurate) United Nations estimates of UK goods exports, not total exports, and so again the problem here is simply a lack of thought on your behalf.

Total UK exports in 2024 were actually GBP893.2bn; a bit of a difference. Exports to the US were GBP200.8bn (22.5% of the total) last year, while exports to Germany were GBP61.7bn (6.9%), France GBP46.9bn (5.2%) and the Netherlands GBP51bn (5.7%).

Exports in 2024 to the three EU countries you picked out accounted for 17.9% of the total, and were therefore equivalent to just under 80% of the value of exports to the US, as I've previously said. Again, very different from the 150% figure you believe to be true.

All the figures I've quoted here are from the ONS and a handy summary can be found in the Trade and investment core statistics book, published a couple of weeks ago.

I do hope you find this useful, along with @Alan Harper's Tash , @roubaixtuesday and particularly @Phil1, special guy that he is.
I'll be on the phone to Trading Economics first thing tomorrow because they clearly don't live up to:


"Reliability and Use

Trading Economics is generally considered a reliable source within the financial community due to its reliance on official data sources and regular fact-checking. Its data is used for market analysis, academic studies, corporate planning, and risk management. The platform's high number of referring domains indicates a strong digital authority and trust within the industry."

They're hardly a bunch of cowboys.

But you know the funniest thing, you've probably spent all afternoon just trying to prove BKB.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top