talkativesprout
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Mar 2009
- Messages
- 10,302
They were the same height and weight back then? ;)Navas joined us when Brahim was 13 years old, I’m not sure what they’ve got to do with each other?
They were the same height and weight back then? ;)Navas joined us when Brahim was 13 years old, I’m not sure what they’ve got to do with each other?
He wasn't "messed about" or "left on bad terms", you're replying to a troll without a doubt.
Brahim looked a serious talent in the academy against other kids but against seasoned players he looked more as he was, a greedy player who thought he was better than he was. He would constantly run down blind alleys and just get crowded out until they took the ball off him. If he has stopped doing that now and finally worked out when to release the ball, then it's taken 4 seasons as a senior to figure it out. He wanted Madrid above all and got his wish along with (I believe) guaranteed games until they were able to ship him out to Milan.
He got his one and only Spanish cap due to covid 2 or 3 years back and it now looks like he's switching allegiance to Morocco. Spain aren't going to miss him.
I have no idea who it is that bumped this thread, but they're morons if they think we need him back.
Respectfully, this shows you have less than 0% knowledge on what happened with Diaz.He wasn't "messed about" or "left on bad terms", you're replying to a troll without a doubt.
Ahh, of course, I'd forgotten that you have "special" knowledge of how things transpired. Do you have any actual evidence or can you even let us all know what you're referring to?Respectfully, this shows you have less than 0% knowledge on what happened with Diaz.
My pleasure - when the club stopped his loan to Las Palmas only to try and fail to sign Mahrez 3 days later and still only use him for 70 minutes total in the second half of the season the family decided they wouldn’t sign a new deal. There’s a bit more to it but that’s the TLDR version.Ahh, of course, I'd forgotten that you have "special" knowledge of how things transpired. Do you have any actual evidence or can you even let us all know what you're referring to?
So you're saying he was entitled and thought he should be given games despite not being good enough to command a starting place? And we messed him about?My pleasure - when the club stopped his loan to Las Palmas only to try and fail to sign Mahrez 3 days later and still only use him for 70 minutes total in the second half of the season the family decided they wouldn’t sign a new deal. There’s a bit more to it but that’s the TLDR version.
Double sourced - 1. Relative who has worked with the first team for over a decade, 2. Relative who acts as a host family for City and still knows the Diaz family.
No, literally the opposite. He was going to Las Palmas, potentially for 18 months, because they knew City couldn’t guarantee him games and was going to sign a new deal. He was told he was needed after Sane got injured, so the move was off, and he was then never used.So you're saying he was entitled and thought he should be given games despite not being good enough to command a starting place? And we messed him about?