D
D
Deleted member 77198
Guest
Just seen that, did well there didn’t I?!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Breaking records/stats thread
- Thread starter Proy
- Start date
jimharri
Moderator
#Crashandburn!Just seen that, did well there didn’t I?!
jimharri
Moderator
Four successive home games coming up in the PL. Get 12 pts from them and I MIGHT start getting quietly confident.
W
W
worsleyweb
Guest
Four successive home games coming up in the PL. Get 12 pts from them and I MIGHT start getting quietly confident.
have we really! That’s good news.
D
D
Deleted member 77198
Guest
I was only thinking this morning it feels like we’ve barely been at the EtihadFour successive home games coming up in the PL. Get 12 pts from them and I MIGHT start getting quietly confident.
We never been there, it alway emptyI was only thinking this morning it feels like we’ve barely been at the Etihad
jimharri
Moderator
have we really! That’s good news.
West HamI was only thinking this morning it feels like we’ve barely been at the Etihad
Wolves
Rags
Saints
Woke this morning with a thought that City are the only team with 3 consecutive managers to win the English PL. (ok I’m 2-3 years late with that thought - shush!)
pretty good definition of a dynasty - multiple consecutive successful leaders.
Rather than a single successful dictator...
NB checking further back, Liverpool pre-PL have had 2 sets of dynasties, early 1900’s (3 managers) and then shankly -> dalglish (4). Interestingly both lasted about the same time, 30 years.
Sunderland also had a dynasty of 3, lasting 40 years starting in 1899 ... though the periods between winning (3 times) the league were well spaced out!
pretty good definition of a dynasty - multiple consecutive successful leaders.
Rather than a single successful dictator...
NB checking further back, Liverpool pre-PL have had 2 sets of dynasties, early 1900’s (3 managers) and then shankly -> dalglish (4). Interestingly both lasted about the same time, 30 years.
Sunderland also had a dynasty of 3, lasting 40 years starting in 1899 ... though the periods between winning (3 times) the league were well spaced out!
Mad Eyed Screamer
Moderator
Yes. Over the last 70 years only 2 rag managers have won the title where as City have had 3 managers over a 6 year periodWoke this morning with a thought that City are the only team with 3 consecutive managers to win the English PL. (ok I’m 2-3 years late with that thought - shush!)
pretty good definition of a dynasty - multiple consecutive successful leaders.
Rather than a single successful dictator...
NB checking further back, Liverpool pre-PL have had 2 sets of dynasties, early 1900’s (3 managers) and then shankly -> dalglish (4). Interestingly both lasted about the same time, 30 years.
Sunderland also had a dynasty of 3, lasting 40 years starting in 1899 ... though the periods between winning (3 times) the league were well spaced out!
jimharri
Moderator
Bet you never thought that Zinch was our most successful player (win percentage-wise) in our 13 year history, eh?